Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37025755›Full record

ReviewSchizophrenia bulletin open2023

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: A Systematic Review.

Jean Addington, Amanda Chao, Amy Braun, Madeline Miller, Megan S Farris

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Schizophrenia bulletin open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jean AddingtonDepartment of Psychiatry, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Amanda ChaoDepartment of Psychiatry, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Amy BraunDepartment of Psychiatry, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Madeline MillerDepartment of Psychiatry, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Megan S FarrisDepartment of Psychiatry, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Funding

ProNET: Psychosis-Risk Outcomes NetworkU01MH124639 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CARRIE E BEARDEN, JOHN M KANE · 2020 to 2026
$81.2M
NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH124639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key issue in both research and clinical work with youth at clinical high risk (CHR) of psychosis is that there are clearly heterogenous clinical outcomes in addition to the development of psychosis. Thus, it is important to capture the psychopathologic outcomes of the CHR group and develop a core outcomes assessment set that may help in dissecting the heterogeneity and aid progress toward new treatments. In assessing psychopathology and often poor social and role functioning, we may be missing the important perspectives of the CHR individuals themselves. It is important to consider the perspectives of youth at CHR by using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). This systematic review of PROMs in CHR was conducted based on a comprehensive search of several databases and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Sixty-four publications were included in the review examining PROMs for symptoms, functioning, quality of life, self-perceptions, stress, and resilience. Typically, PROMs were not the primary focus of the studies reviewed. The PROMs summarized here fit with results published elsewhere in the literature based on interviewer measures. However, very few of the measures used were validated for CHR or for youth. There are several recommendations for determining a core set of PROMs for use with CHR.

Indexed as

clinical assessmentspsychosisself-reportultra high risk

Identifiers

PMID37025755
PMCPMC10069322

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.