Trial reportJAMA network open2023
Efficacy and Safety of Anakinra Plus Standard of Care for Patients With Severe COVID-19: A Randomized Phase 2/3 Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04443881 (Clinical Trial of the Use of Anakinra in Cytokine Storm Syndrome Secondary to Covid-19. A Phase 2/3, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel Group, 2-arm, Multicenter Study Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Administrations of Anakinra, an Interleukin-1), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Trial of the Use of Anakinra in Cytokine Storm Syndrome Secondary to Covid-19. A Phase 2/3, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel Group, 2-arm, Multicenter Study Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Administrations of Anakinra, an Interleukin-1(IL-1) Receptor Antagonist, Added to Standard of Care, Versus Standard of Care, in Reducing Hyper-inflammation and Respiratory Distress in Patients With SARS- CoV-2 Infection
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- The NLRP3 inflammasome in physiological and dysfunctional host response in human sepsis and critical illness: a narrative review.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- Dynamic hyperinflammatory response assessment using HIC scores in COVID-19: application to a large series of patients receiving anakinra.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Pyroptosis in Respiratory Virus Infections: A Narrative Review of Mechanisms, Pathophysiology, and Potential Therapeutic Interventions.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Weathering the Storm: How Age and Biologics Influence the COVID-19 Cytokine Surge.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Management of SARS-CoV-2 Infection-Clinical Practice Guidelines of the Polish Association of Epidemiologists and Infectiologists, for 2025.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- COVID-19: A Disease Driven by Protease/Antiprotease Imbalance? A Specific Review Five Years into the Pandemic.Infection and drug resistance · 2025Review
- Article
- Establishment and validation of a prognostic model based on common laboratory indicators for SARS-CoV-2 infection in Chinese population.Annals of medicine · 2024Article
- Adverse drug reactions associated with COVID-19 management.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2024Review
- Interleukin 1β receptor blocker (Anakinra) and regenerative stem cell therapy: two novel approaches effectively ameliorating diabetic cardiomyopathy.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2024Article
- Investigating the impact of Tocilizumab, Sarilumab, and Anakinra on clinical outcomes in COVID-19: A systematic review andInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2024Review
- Cyclosporin A as an Add-On Therapy to a Corticosteroid-Based Background Treatment in Patients with COVID-19: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Identification of biomarkers for COVID-19 associated secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- COVID-19 therapeutics.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024Review
- Innate Immunity in Protection and Pathogenesis During Coronavirus Infections and COVID-19.Annual review of immunology · 2024Review
- The influence of 4G/5G polymorphism in the plasminogen-activator-inhibitor-1 promoter on COVID-19 severity and endothelial dysfunction.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- An Update on SARS-CoV-2 Clinical Trial Results-What We Can Learn for the Next Pandemic.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Adjunctive treatment in COVID-19 and sepsis-What did we learn?Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2023Review
- Review
- Anakinra authorized to treat severe coronavirus disease 2019; Sepsis breakthrough or time to reflect?Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: COVID-19 pneumonia is often associated with hyperinflammation. The efficacy and safety of anakinra in treating patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and hyperinflammation are still unclear. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of anakinra vs standard of care alone for patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and hyperinflammation. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Clinical Trial of the Use of Anakinra in Cytokine Storm Syndrome Secondary to COVID-19 (ANA-COVID-GEAS) was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, 2-group, phase 2/3 clinical trial conducted at 12 hospitals in Spain between May 8, 2020, and March 1, 2021, with a follow-up of 1 month. Participants were adult patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and hyperinflammation. Hyperinflammation was defined as interleukin-6 greater than 40 pg/mL, ferritin greater than 500 ng/mL, C-reactive protein greater than 3 mg/dL (rationale, ≥5 upper normal limit), and/or lactate dehydrogenase greater than 300 U/L. Severe pneumonia was considered if at least 1 of the following conditions was met: ambient air oxygen saturation 94% or less measured with a pulse oximeter, ratio of partial pressure O2 to fraction of inspired O2 of 300 or less, and/or a ratio of O2 saturation measured with pulse oximeter to fraction of inspired O2 of 350 or less. Data analysis was performed from April to October 2021. Interventions: Usual standard of care plus anakinra (anakinra group) or usual standard of care alone (SoC group). Anakinra was given at a dose of 100 mg 4 times a day intravenously. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients not requiring mechanical ventilation up to 15 days after treatment initiation, assessed on an intention-to-treat basis. Results: A total of 179 patients (123 men [69.9%]; mean [SD] age, 60.5 [11.5] years) were randomly assigned to the anakinra group (92 patients) or to the SoC group (87 patients). The proportion of patients not requiring mechanical ventilation up to day 15 was not significantly different between groups (64 of 83 patients [77.1%] in the anakinra group vs 67 of 78 patients [85.9%] in the SoC group; risk ratio [RR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.77-1.04; P = .16). Anakinra did not result in any difference in time to mechanical ventilation (hazard ratio, 1.72; 95% CI, 0.82-3.62; P = .14). There was no significant difference between groups in the proportion of patients not requiring invasive mechanical ventilation up to day 15 (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.88-1.11; P > .99). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, anakinra did not prevent the need for mechanical ventilation or reduce mortality risk compared with standard of care alone among hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04443881.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.