Trial reportThe American journal of medicine2023
Patient-Tailored Interventions to Improve Specialty Medication Adherence: Results from a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in The American journal of medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Racial and Socioeconomic Differences in Real-World Use of Biologic Therapy for Asthma.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2026Article
- Evaluating patient-reported adherence and outcomes in specialty disease states: A dual-site initiative.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2024Article
- Usability and feasibility of the Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI) Toolkit in daily clinical practice: The BANANA study.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2024Article
- Influenza vaccination and use of lipid lowering therapies in adults with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: An analysis of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS).American heart journal · 2024Article
- Self-injection experiences among transgender people on injectable gender-affirming hormone therapy: A narrative review.Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhAReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSpecialty medication nonadherence results in poor clinical outcomes and increased costs. This study evaluated the impact of patient-tailored interventions on specialty medication adherence.
methodsA pragmatic, randomized controlled trial was conducted at a single-center health-system specialty pharmacy from May 2019 to August 2021. Participants included recently nonadherent patients prescribed self-administered specialty medications from multiple specialty clinics. Eligible patients were stratified by historical clinic rates of nonadherence and randomized 1:1 to usual care or intervention arms. Intervention patients received patient-tailored interventions and 8 months of follow-up. A Wilcoxon test was used to analyze the difference in 6-, 8-, and 12-month post-enrollment adherence, calculated using proportion of days covered, between the intervention and usual care arms.
resultsFour hundred and thirty eight patients were randomized. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups: mostly women (68%), white (82%), with a median age of 54 years (interquartile range, 40, 64). The most common reasons for nonadherence in the intervention arm were memory (37%) and unreachability (28%). There was a significant difference in median proportion of days covered between patients in the usual care and intervention arms at 8-months (0.88 vs 0.94, P < .001), 6-months (0.90 vs 0.95, P = .003), and 12-months post-enrollment (0.87 vs 0.93, P < .001).
conclusionsPatient-tailored interventions resulted in significant specialty medication adherence improvement compared with standard of care. Specialty pharmacies should consider targeting nonadherent patients for adherence interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.