ReviewWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2023
Deciphering the recent trends in pesticide bioremediation using genome editing and multi-omics approaches: a review.
Review in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microbial Metabolic Strategies for Environmental Detoxification: From Enzymatic Mechanisms to Synthetic Biology and Omics.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Microbial consortia for pesticide biodegradation: mechanisms, cross-class pathways, and translational challenges.Biodegradation · 2026Review
- The microbial strategies for the management of chemical pesticides: A comprehensive review.Current research in microbial sciences · 2026Review
- From Biocontrol to Synthesis: Innovative Progress ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Diversity of glyphosate-degrading bacteria and degradation genes from Xinjiang cotton field's unique soil environment.Environmental microbiome · 2025Article
- Engineering a novel carbaryl-degrading esterase from Bacillus velezensis for enhanced degradability via semi-rational design and whole-cell biocatalysis.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Transformative strategies for saline soil restoration: Harnessing halotolerant microorganisms and advanced technologies.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Review
- First Clarification of the Involvement of Glycosyltransferase MdUGT73CG22 in the Detoxification Metabolism of Nicosulfuron in Apple.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Rice quality prediction and assessment of pesticide residue changes during storage based on Quatformer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Pesticide Use and Degradation Strategies: Food Safety, Challenges and Perspectives.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pesticide pollution in recent times has emerged as a grave environmental problem contaminating both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems owing to their widespread use. Bioremediation using gene editing and system biology could be developed as an eco-friendly and proficient tool to remediate pesticide-contaminated sites due to its advantages and greater public acceptance over the physical and chemical methods. However, it is indispensable to understand the different aspects associated with microbial metabolism and their physiology for efficient pesticide remediation. Therefore, this review paper analyses the different gene editing tools and multi-omics methods in microbes to produce relevant evidence regarding genes, proteins and metabolites associated with pesticide remediation and the approaches to contend against pesticide-induced stress. We systematically discussed and analyzed the recent reports (2015-2022) on multi-omics methods for pesticide degradation to elucidate the mechanisms and the recent advances associated with the behaviour of microbes under diverse environmental conditions. This study envisages that CRISPR-Cas, ZFN and TALEN as gene editing tools utilizing Pseudomonas, Escherichia coli and Achromobacter sp. can be employed for remediation of chlorpyrifos, parathion-methyl, carbaryl, triphenyltin and triazophos by creating gRNA for expressing specific genes for the bioremediation. Similarly, systems biology accompanying multi-omics tactics revealed that microbial strains from Paenibacillus, Pseudomonas putida, Burkholderia cenocepacia, Rhodococcus sp. and Pencillium oxalicum are capable of degrading deltamethrin, p-nitrophenol, chlorimuron-ethyl and nicosulfuron. This review lends notable insights into the research gaps and provides potential solutions for pesticide remediation by using different microbe-assisted technologies. The inferences drawn from the current study will help researchers, ecologists, and decision-makers gain comprehensive knowledge of value and application of systems biology and gene editing in bioremediation assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.