ArticleScientific reports2023
Live 4D-OCT denoising with self-supervised deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Real-time OCT-guided strategies for optimization of precision and safety in vitreoretinal surgery].Die Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- Using Principal Components Analysis to Visualize Motion and Mitigate Artifacts in Dynamic Optical Coherence Tomography.Journal of biophotonics · 2026Article
- Deep Learning for Autonomous Surgical Guidance Using 3-Dimensional Images From Forward-Viewing Endoscopic Optical Coherence Tomography.Journal of biophotonics · 2025Article
- Self-supervised model-informed deep learning for low-SNR SS-OCT domain transformation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- SpecstatOR: speckle statistics-based iOCT segmentation network for ophthalmic surgery.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Denoising OCT videos based on temporal redundancy.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Unpaired intra-operative OCT (iOCT) video super-resolution with contrastive learning.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
By providing three-dimensional visualization of tissues and instruments at high resolution, live volumetric optical coherence tomography (4D-OCT) has the potential to revolutionize ophthalmic surgery. However, the necessary imaging speed is accompanied by increased noise levels. A high data rate and the requirement for minimal latency impose major limitations for real-time noise reduction. In this work, we propose a low complexity neural network for denoising, directly incorporated into the image reconstruction pipeline of a microscope-integrated 4D-OCT prototype with an A-scan rate of 1.2 MHz. For this purpose, we trained a blind-spot network on unpaired OCT images using a self-supervised learning approach. With an optimized U-Net, only a few milliseconds of additional latency were introduced. Simultaneously, these architectural adaptations improved the numerical denoising performance compared to the basic setup, outperforming non-local filtering algorithms. Layers and edges of anatomical structures in B-scans were better preserved than with Gaussian filtering despite comparable processing time. By comparing scenes with and without denoising employed, we show that neural networks can be used to improve visual appearance of volumetric renderings in real time. Enhancing the rendering quality is an important step for the clinical acceptance and translation of 4D-OCT as an intra-surgical guidance tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.