ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2023
Memory characteristics in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: Insights from an eye tracking memory game and neuropsychological assessments.
Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Memory characteristics in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: Insights from an eye tracking memory game and neuropsychological assessments.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2023Article
- Frontal lobe epilepsy: an eye tracking study of memory and attention.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo compare different patterns of memory impairment in patients with two subtypes of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) and healthy controls.
methodsThirty-five healthy controls and 41 patients with MTLE were recruited, of which 25 patients were diagnosed as hippocampal sclerosis (HS-MTLE), and the rest 16 patients were lesion-negative (MRI-neg MTLE). Participants completed the Wechsler memory assessment and a short-term memory game on an automated computer-based memory assessment platform with an eye tracker.
resultsBoth the MRI-neg MTLE and HS-MTLE groups took longer time to complete the short-term memory game than healthy controls (p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 1.087; p = 0.047, Cohen's d = 0.787). During the memory encoding phase, the MRI-neg MTLE group spent significantly shorter time than healthy controls on the difficult levels with three (p = 0.004, Cohen's d = 0.993) and four targets (p = 0.016, Cohen's d = 0.858). During the memory decoding phase, the HS-MTLE group spent less time looking on the targets compared to controls when recalling and finding four targets (p = 0.004, Cohen's d = -0.793), while the MRI-neg MTLE group spent significantly longer time on the distractors and shorter time on the region of interests (ROIs) for all difficulty levels (all p < 0.05) than controls. Furthermore, the eye tracking data were correlated with the scores of the Wechsler Memory Scale after Bonferroni correction (p < 0.05).
conclusionPatients with MRI-neg MTLE demonstrate impaired memory mostly due to attention deficits, while those with HS-MTLE show memory impairment with relative sparing of attention. Eye tracking technology has the potential of facilitating the investigation of the mechanism of memory defect in MTLE and can serve as a supplementary neuropsychological tool for clinical diagnosis and long-term monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.