ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023
Clinical factors associated with functional outcomes in patients with single subcortical infarction with neurological deterioration.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Correlations of Clinical Outcomes and Vascular Morphology With Infarct Patterns in Middle Cerebral Arterial Occlusion.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Fear of progression profiles and their association with quality of life and depression in ischemic stroke survivors: a latent profile analysis.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- The comparison of the risk of neurological deterioration and clinical outcomes in different atherosclerotic stroke patterns.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A machine learning-based predictive model for predicting early neurological deterioration in lenticulostriate atheromatous disease-related infarction.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- The impact of asymptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis on the clinical outcomes of patients with single subcortical infarction.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Factors that predict poor outcomes in patients with single subcortical infarction (SSI) may differ from those that predict poor outcomes in the SSI subgroup with neurological deterioration (ND). This study aimed to investigate the effect of ND on functional outcomes in patients with SSI and the clinical factors that predict poor outcomes in patients with SSI with ND (SSI-ND) and in all patients with SSI. Methods: Patients with SSI were consecutively enrolled in this study. ND was defined as an increase of ≥2 points in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) total score, an increase of ≥1 point in the NIHSS subscore of consciousness or motor function, or any new neurological deficit. Results: A total of 255 patients were enrolled, and nine (3.53%) were lost to a follow-up. ND [adjusted relative risk (aRR) = 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.22-1.55, Conclusions: ND is an independent predictor of poor outcomes in patients with SSI, and poor outcome determinants in the SSI-ND subgroup and in all patients with SSI are not identical. For patients with SSI-ND, PAD could aggravate ND and was therefore an essential predictor of poor outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.