Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37047186›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

A PCOS Paradox: Does Inositol Therapy Find a Rationale in All the Different Phenotypes?

Vittorio Unfer, Simona Dinicola, Michele Russo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. FromFrontiers in endocrinology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Hyperandrogenic eumenorrheic NON-PCOS womenJournal of clinical & translational endocrinology · 2024
    Article
  12. PCOS phenotype focus: phenotype D under the magnifying glass.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. D-Chiro-Inositol in Endometrial Hyperplasia: A Pilot Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vittorio UnferThe Experts Group on Inositol in Basic and Clinical Research (EGOI), 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1805-3181
Simona DinicolaThe Experts Group on Inositol in Basic and Clinical Research (EGOI), 00161 Rome, Italy.
Michele RussoR&D Department, Lo.Li. Pharma, 00156 Rome, Italy.
European Gravitational Observatory · ITSaint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recent evaluation of the published data regarding the PCOS topic has highlighted a paradox in the definition of this condition. Even though the name of the syndrome refers to ovarian dysfunction, it seems that patients diagnosed with PCOS are more likely affected by an endocrine and metabolic issue. The term PCOS might not be appropriate to indicate the phenotypes described by the Rotterdam criteria, since the only phenotype with a gynecological issue alone is PCOS phenotype D. This novel perspective regarding how PCOS is currently defined leads the way to a reinterpretation of the entire pathological context and the treatment prescribed, such as inositols. A new point of view on the etiopathogenesis of the disease completely changes the current meaning of PCOS and consequently the therapeutic rationale evaluated to date.

Indexed as

InositolPolycystic Ovary SyndromeFemaleHumansPhenotypeInositoldysmetabolismendocrine syndromemyo-inositolPCOSphenotype D

Identifiers

PMID37047186
PMCPMC10094056
OpenAlexW4361008127

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.