ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023
Reproductive and Obstetric Outcomes after Fertility-Sparing Treatments for Cervical Cancer: Current Approach and Future Directions.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Study on Echinacoside-Copper Metal-Phenolic Networks Hydrogel System Loaded with Diallyl Trisulfide for Local Treatment of Cervical Cancer.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Risk factors for preterm birth and prolonged pregnancy following cervical cerclage in women with cervical insufficiency: a retrospective analysis and predictive model.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Roles of Goserelin in Gynecological Disorders.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Association between cervical conization and pregnancy outcomes: A nationwide population-based cohort study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Fertility-Sparing Management of HPV-Associated FIGO IB1 Mucinous Cervical Adenocarcinoma With Signet-Ring Cell Features: A Case Report.Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Article
- Reproductive concerns in young women with cervical cancer: latent profiles and key influencing factors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Advancing cervical cancer treatment: integrating cannabinoids, combination therapies and nanotechnology.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Review
- The Role of Medical Therapies in the Management of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Meta-analysis of risk factors for recurrence in cervical cancer patients following fertility-sparing treatment.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Risks of Cervical Cancer Recurrence After Fertility-Sparing Surgery and the Role of Human Papillomavirus Infection Types.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Oncologic and Obstetric Outcomes Following Radical Abdominal Trachelectomy in Non-Low-Risk Early-Stage Cervical Cancers: A 10-Year Austrian Single-Center Experience.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- A predictive model for residual lesions after LEEP surgery in CIN III patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death in women of reproductive age. The established fertility-sparing approaches for the management of early-stage cervical cancer for women who plan pregnancy are associated with a decline in fecundity and an increased risk of pregnancy complications. This article aims to offer an overview of fertility-sparing approaches and the management of potential subfertility and pregnancy complications after these treatments. An extensive search for the available data about infertility and cervical cancer, fertility-sparing techniques in patients with cervical cancer, fertility treatment, obstetrical complications, and pregnancy outcomes in cervical cancer patients was completed. Fertility-preserving procedures such as loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), cold-knife conization, and trachelectomy in women diagnosed with cervical cancer can be considered as safe and effective treatments that preserve reproductive potential. Current fertility-preserving procedures, based on the balance of the oncological characteristics of patients as well as their desire for reproduction, allow one to obtain acceptable reproductive and obstetric outcomes in women treated for cervical cancer. Nevertheless, careful monitoring of pregnancies obtained after fertility-preserving procedures is recommended, since this cohort of patients should be considered at higher risk compared with a healthy population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.