SynthesisNutrients2023
The Role of Genetically Engineered Probiotics for Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- The anti-inflammatory effects of three different dietary supplement interventions.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Trial
- Review
- Unraveling the drug resistance web in IBD: The gut microbiota-immunity-epigenetics axis.Gut microbes · 2026Review
- Advances of oral micro- and nanomedicines for modulating intestinal barriers in the treatment of intestinal diseases.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- Oral probiotic delivery-based therapeutic strategies for inflammatory bowel disease.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2026Review
- Topical Application of Probiotic-Derived EGF FromAnnals of dermatology · 2026Article
- Butyrate-Producing Bacteria in Intestinal Disease Therapy: Potential and Challenges.Biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- From dysbacteriosis to ecological remodeling: A new breakthrough in microbial treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.iScience · 2026Review
- Probiotics and the Human Microbiome: Classical Functions, Emerging Systemic Roles, and Future Therapeutic Frontiers.Biology · 2026Review
- Polydopamine cross-linked Bifidobacterium single cell core-shell system with multi-target regulation to alleviate constipation in mice.Archives of microbiology · 2026Article
- From dysbiosis to precision medicine: targeting the microbial-metabolic axis in IBD management.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Therapeutic Potential of Probiotics: A Review of Their Role in Modulating Inflammation.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Being a better version of yourself: genetically engineered probiotic bacteria as host defense enhancers in the control of intestinal pathogens.Gut microbes · 2025Review
- EngineeredActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025Article
- Engineering the Microbiome: a Novel Approach to Managing Autoimmune Diseases.Neuromolecular medicine · 2025Review
- Gut-liver axis in diabetes: Mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- The role of short-chain fatty acid in metabolic syndrome and its complications: focusing on immunity and inflammation.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- The Microbiome in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Short-chain fatty acids: linking diet, the microbiome and immunity.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2024Review
- Next-Generation Probiotics as Novel Therapeutics for Improving Human Health: Current Trends and Future Perspectives.Microorganisms · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMany preclinical studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of genetically modified probiotics (gm probiotics) in animal models of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
objectiveThis systematic review was performed to investigate the role of gm probiotics in treating IBD and to clarify the involved mechanisms.
methodsPubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Medline were searched from their inception to 18 September 2022 to identify preclinical and clinical studies exploring the efficacy of gm probiotics in IBD animal models or IBD patients. Two independent researchers extracted data from the included studies, and the data were pooled by the type of study; that is, preclinical or clinical.
resultsForty-five preclinical studies were included. In these studies, sodium dextran sulfate and trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid were used to induce colitis. Eleven probiotic species have been genetically modified to produce therapeutic substances, including IL-10, antimicrobial peptides, antioxidant enzymes, and short-chain fatty acids, with potential therapeutic properties against colitis. The results showed generally positive effects of gm probiotics in reducing disease activity and ameliorating intestinal damage in IBD models; however, the efficacy of gm probiotics compared to that of wild-type probiotics in many studies was unclear. The main mechanisms identified include modulation of the diversity and composition of the gut microbiota, production of regulatory metabolites by beneficial bacteria, reduction of the pro- to anti-inflammatory cytokine ratio in colonic tissue and plasma, modulation of oxidative stress activity in the colon, and improvement of intestinal barrier integrity. Moreover, only one clinical trial with 10 patients with Crohn's disease was included, which showed that
conclusionsGm probiotics have a certain efficacy in colitis models through several mechanisms. However, given the scarcity of clinical trials, it is important for researchers to pay more attention to gm probiotics that are more effective and safer than wild-type probiotics to facilitate further clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.