Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37050879›Full record

ReviewPlant communications2023

Genomics of plant speciation.

Dan G Bock, Zhe Cai, Cassandra Elphinstone, Eric González-Segovia, Kaede Hirabayashi, Kaichi Huang, Graeme L Keais, Amy Kim, Gregory L Owens, Loren H Rieseberg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Genetics and genomics of hybridization.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  3. The dynamics of introgression and parallel adaptation across North AmericanProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. DioeciousAoB PLANTS · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Diploidization in a wild rice allopolyploid is both episodic and gradual.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dan G BockDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Zhe CaiDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Cassandra ElphinstoneDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Eric González-SegoviaDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Kaede HirabayashiDepartment of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Kaichi HuangDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Graeme L KeaisDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Amy KimDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Gregory L OwensDepartment of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Loren H RiesebergDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Electronic address: lriesebe@mail.ubc.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of plants have been instrumental for revealing how new species originate. For several decades, botanical research has complemented and, in some cases, challenged concepts on speciation developed via the study of other organisms while also revealing additional ways in which species can form. Now, the ability to sequence genomes at an unprecedented pace and scale has allowed biologists to settle decades-long debates and tackle other emerging challenges in speciation research. Here, we review these recent genome-enabled developments in plant speciation. We discuss complications related to identification of reproductive isolation (RI) loci using analyses of the landscape of genomic divergence and highlight the important role that structural variants have in speciation, as increasingly revealed by new sequencing technologies. Further, we review how genomics has advanced what we know of some routes to new species formation, like hybridization or whole-genome duplication, while casting doubt on others, like population bottlenecks and genetic drift. While genomics can fast-track identification of genes and mutations that confer RI, we emphasize that follow-up molecular and field experiments remain critical. Nonetheless, genomics has clarified the outsized role of ancient variants rather than new mutations, particularly early during speciation. We conclude by highlighting promising avenues of future study. These include expanding what we know so far about the role of epigenetic and structural changes during speciation, broadening the scope and taxonomic breadth of plant speciation genomics studies, and synthesizing information from extensive genomic data that have already been generated by the plant speciation community.

Indexed as

GenomicsPlantsGenome, PlantHybridization, GeneticReproductive Isolationgenomic islands of speciationhybrid speciationpolyploid speciationreproductive isolationstanding genetic variationstructural variation

Identifiers

PMID37050879
PMCPMC10504567

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.