Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37052679›Full record

Observational studyEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin2023

A third vaccine dose equalises the levels of effectiveness and immunogenicity of heterologous or homologous COVID-19 vaccine regimens, Lyon, France, December 2021 to March 2022.

Nicolas Guibert, Kylian Trepat, Bruno Pozzetto, Laurence Josset, Jean-Baptiste Fassier, Omran Allatif, Kahina Saker, Karen Brengel-Pesce, Thierry Walzer, Philippe Vanhems and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicolas GuibertOccupational Health and Medicine Department, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon1, Université Gustave Eiffel-IFSTTAR, UMRESTTE, UMR T_9405, Lyon University, Lyon, France.
Kylian TrepatCIRI - Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Inserm, U1111, CNRS, UMR5308, ENS Lyon, Université Jean Monnet de Saint-Etienne, Lyon, France.
Bruno PozzettoCIRI - Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Inserm, U1111, CNRS, UMR5308, ENS Lyon, Université Jean Monnet de Saint-Etienne, Lyon, France.
Laurence JossetCIRI - Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Inserm, U1111, CNRS, UMR5308, ENS Lyon, Université Jean Monnet de Saint-Etienne, Lyon, France.
Jean-Baptiste FassierOccupational Health and Medicine Department, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon1, Université Gustave Eiffel-IFSTTAR, UMRESTTE, UMR T_9405, Lyon University, Lyon, France.
Omran AllatifCIRI - Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Inserm, U1111, CNRS, UMR5308, ENS Lyon, Université Jean Monnet de Saint-Etienne, Lyon, France.
Kahina SakerJoint Research Unit Civils Hospices of Lyon-bioMérieux, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Sud Hospital, Pierre-Bénite, France.
Karen Brengel-PesceJoint Research Unit Civils Hospices of Lyon-bioMérieux, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Sud Hospital, Pierre-Bénite, France.
Thierry WalzerCIRI - Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Inserm, U1111, CNRS, UMR5308, ENS Lyon, Université Jean Monnet de Saint-Etienne, Lyon, France.
Philippe VanhemsCIRI - Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Inserm, U1111, CNRS, UMR5308, ENS Lyon, Université Jean Monnet de Saint-Etienne, Lyon, France.
Sophie Trouillet-AssantCIRI - Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Inserm, U1111, CNRS, UMR5308, ENS Lyon, Université Jean Monnet de Saint-Etienne, Lyon, France.
Lyon-COVID study groupThe members of the project group are acknowledged at the end of the article.
Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRUnité Mixte de Recherche Epidémiologique et de Surveillance Transport Travail EnvironnementbioMérieux (France) · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRHôpital Edouard Herriot · FRThe Design Knowledge Company (United States) · USUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversité Jean Monnet · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundTo cope with the persistence of the COVID-19 epidemic and the decrease in antibody levels following vaccination, a third dose of vaccine has been recommended in the general population. However, several vaccine regimens had been used initially for the primary vaccination course, and the heterologous Vaxzevria/Comirnaty regimen had shown better efficacy and immunogenicity than the homologous Comirnaty/Comirnaty regimen.AimWe wanted to determine if this benefit was retained after a third dose of an mRNA vaccine.MethodsWe combined an observational epidemiological study of SARS-CoV-2 infections among vaccinated healthcare workers at the University Hospital of Lyon, France, with a prospective cohort study to analyse immunological parameters before and after the third mRNA vaccine dose.ResultsFollowing the second vaccine dose, heterologous vaccination regimens were more protective against infection than homologous regimens (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 1.88; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.18-3.00; p = 0.008), but this was no longer the case after the third dose (adjusted HR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.72-1.02; p = 0.082). Receptor-binding domain-specific IgG levels and serum neutralisation capacity against different SARS-CoV-2 variants were higher after the third dose than after the second dose in the homologous regimen group, but not in the heterologous group.ConclusionThe advantage conferred by heterologous vaccination was lost after the third dose in terms of both protection and immunogenicity. Immunological measurements 1 month after vaccination suggest that heterologous vaccination induces maximal immunity after the second dose, whereas the third dose is required to reach the same level in individuals with a homologous regimen.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesFranceHumansProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2VaccinationAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccinesbreakthrough infectionhealthcare workersheterologous vaccine regimensneutralisationSARS-CoV-2vaccination

Identifiers

PMID37052679
PMCPMC10103547
OpenAlexW4365443543

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.