Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37055258›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2023

A new polygenic score for refractive error improves detection of children at risk of high myopia but not the prediction of those at risk of myopic macular degeneration.

Rosie Clark, Samantha Sze-Yee Lee, Ran Du, Yining Wang, Sander C M Kneepkens, Jason Charng, Yu Huang, Michael L Hunter, Chen Jiang, J Willem L Tideman and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Polygenic Risk Scores for Myopia: A Systematic Review of Predictive Performance and Clinical Potential.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. IMI-Myopia Genetics Report.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Review
  12. IMI-2025 Digest.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Article
  13. Revisiting the Trans-Ancestry Genetic Correlation of Refractive Error.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Time Spent Outdoors Partly Accounts for the Effect of Education on Myopia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 10 institutions in 7 countries.

Rosie ClarkSchool of Optometry & Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Maindy Road, Cardiff, CF24 4HQ, UK.
Samantha Sze-Yee LeeUniversity of Western Australia, Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science (incorporating the Lions Eye Institute), Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Ran DuDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 1138510, Japan; Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, 100045, China.
Yining WangDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 1138510, Japan.
Sander C M KneepkensDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Jason CharngUniversity of Western Australia, Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science (incorporating the Lions Eye Institute), Perth, Western Australia, Australia; Department of Optometry, School of Allied Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Yu HuangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Eye Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Michael L HunterBusselton Health Study Centre, Busselton Population Medical Research Institute, Busselton, Western Australia; School of Population and Global Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia.
Chen JiangDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
J Willem L TidemanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands; Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Ronald B MellesDepartment of Ophthalmology Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Redwood City, CA, USA.
Caroline C W KlaverDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Institute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Ophthalmology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
David A MackeyUniversity of Western Australia, Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science (incorporating the Lions Eye Institute), Perth, Western Australia, Australia; Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; School of Medicine, Menzies Research Institute Tasmania, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Cathy WilliamsCentre for Academic Child Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS81NU, UK.
Hélène ChoquetDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Kyoko Ohno-MatsuiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 1138510, Japan.
Jeremy A GuggenheimSchool of Optometry & Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Maindy Road, Cardiff, CF24 4HQ, UK. Electronic address: guggenheimj1@cardiff.ac.uk.
CREAM Consortium
UK Biobank Eye and Vision Consortium
University of Bristol · GBLions Eye Institute · AUCardiff University · GBTokyo Medical and Dental University · JPErasmus MC · NLKaiser Permanente · USRadboud University Nijmegen · NLGuangdong Academy of Medical Sciences · CNKaiser Permanente Redwood City Medical Center · USThe University of Western Australia · AU

Funding

A Resource for Genetic Epidemiology Research in Adult Health and AgingRC2AG036607 · NIA · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI RISCH, NEIL J., SCHAEFER, CATHERINE ANN · 2009 to 2010
$24.8M
The Role of Refractive Error in the Etiology of GlaucomaR01EY027004 · NEI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CHOQUET, HELENE · 2017 to 2020
$1.6M
The Role of Genetic and Non-Genetic Factors and Causal Mechanisms Underlying Cataract Susceptibility For Risk PredictionR01EY033010 · NEI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CHOQUET, HELENE, LACHKE, SALIL · 2022 to 2025
$1.6M
Medical Research Council G9815508Medical Research Council MC_PC_15018Medical Research Council MC_PC_19009Medical Research Council MC_UU_00007/10Medical Research Council MR/T019050/1Medical Research Council MR/T033371/1NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027004NEI NIH HHS R01 EY033010NIA NIH HHS RC2 AG036607Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh myopia (HM), defined as a spherical equivalent refractive error (SER) ≤ -6.00 diopters (D), is a leading cause of sight impairment, through myopic macular degeneration (MMD). We aimed to derive an improved polygenic score (PGS) for predicting children at risk of HM and to test if a PGS is predictive of MMD after accounting for SER.

methodsThe PGS was derived from genome-wide association studies in participants of UK Biobank, CREAM Consortium, and Genetic Epidemiology Research on Adult Health and Aging. MMD severity was quantified by a deep learning algorithm. Prediction of HM was quantified as the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC). Prediction of severe MMD was assessed by logistic regression.

findingsIn independent samples of European, African, South Asian and East Asian ancestry, the PGS explained 19% (95% confidence interval 17-21%), 2% (1-3%), 8% (7-10%) and 6% (3-9%) of the variation in SER, respectively. The AUROC for HM in these samples was 0.78 (0.75-0.81), 0.58 (0.53-0.64), 0.71 (0.69-0.74) and 0.67 (0.62-0.72), respectively. The PGS was not associated with the risk of MMD after accounting for SER: OR = 1.07 (0.92-1.24).

interpretationPerformance of the PGS approached the level required for clinical utility in Europeans but not in other ancestries. A PGS for refractive error was not predictive of MMD risk once SER was accounted for.

fundingSupported by the Welsh Government and Fight for Sight (24WG201).

Indexed as

Macular DegenerationMyopiaAdultAfrican PeopleChildEast Asian PeopleEthnicityEuropean PeopleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansSouth Asian PeopleALSPACGeneration RMyopiaPolygenic scoreUK Biobank

Identifiers

PMID37055258
PMCPMC10203044
OpenAlexW4364359588

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.