Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37055730›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

Development and validation of a screening questionnaire for early identification of pregnant women at risk for excessive gestational weight gain.

Kristina Geyer, Roxana Raab, Julia Hoffmann, Hans Hauner

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01958307 (Healthy Living in Pregnancy), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01958307 nacompletednot on this map

Healthy Living in Pregnancy

TypeinterventionalSponsorTechnical University of MunichRan2013 to 2022Enrolled2,286ConditionsLifestyle, Weight Gain, PregnancyArmsLifestyle intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kristina GeyerInstitute of Nutritional Medicine, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Centre for Nutritional Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 62, 80992, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9157-0070
Roxana RaabInstitute of Nutritional Medicine, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Centre for Nutritional Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 62, 80992, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4700-3722
Julia HoffmannInstitute of Nutritional Medicine, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Centre for Nutritional Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 62, 80992, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5504-7311
Hans HaunerInstitute of Nutritional Medicine, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Centre for Nutritional Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 62, 80992, Munich, Germany. hans.hauner@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1682-5088

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExcessive weight gain during pregnancy is associated with adverse health outcomes for mother and child. Intervention strategies to prevent excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) should consider women's individual risk profile, however, no tool exists for identifying women at risk at an early stage. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate a screening questionnaire based on early risk factors for excessive GWG.

methodsThe cohort from the German "Gesund leben in der Schwangerschaft"/ "healthy living in pregnancy" (GeliS) trial was used to derive a risk score predicting excessive GWG. Sociodemographics, anthropometrics, smoking behaviour and mental health status were collected before week 12

results1790 women were included in the analysis, of whom 45.6% showed excessive GWG. High pre-pregnancy body mass index, intermediate educational level, being born in a foreign country, primiparity, smoking, and signs of depressive disorder were associated with the risk of excessive GWG and included in the screening questionnaire. The developed score varied from 0-15 and divided the women´s risk for excessive GWG into low (0-5), moderate (6-10) and high (11-15). The cross-validation and the external validation yielded a moderate predictive power with an AUC of 0.709 and 0.738, respectively.

conclusionsOur screening questionnaire is a simple and valid tool to identify pregnant women at risk for excessive GWG at an early stage. It could be used in routine care to provide targeted primary prevention measures to women at particular risk to gain excessive gestational weight.

trial registrationNCT01958307, ClinicalTrials.gov, retrospectively registered 9 October 2013.

Indexed as

Gestational Weight GainPregnancy ComplicationsBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansParturitionPilot ProjectsPregnancyPregnant PeopleSurveys and QuestionnairesWeight GainExcessive gestational weight gainGeliSObesityPregnancyPreventionRisk scoreRoutine careScreening questionnaire

Identifiers

PMID37055730
PMCPMC10100402

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.