Evidence mapPaperPMID 37058418Full record

ArticleDiabetes2023

Comparison of Novel Wide-Field In Vivo Corneal Confocal Microscopy With Skin Biopsy for Assessing Peripheral Neuropathy in Type 2 Diabetes.

Reza A Badian, Linnéa Ekman, Are Hugo Pripp, Tor Paaske Utheim, Elisabet Englund, Lars B Dahlin, Olov Rolandsson, Neil Lagali

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Electroacupuncture regulates the P2XPurinergic signalling · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Quantifying the Corneal Nerve Whorl Pattern.Translational vision science & technology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Reza A BadianDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Unit of Regenerative Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1773-3780
Linnéa EkmanDepartment of Translational Medicine, Hand Surgery, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Are Hugo PrippOslo Centre of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Research Support Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Tor Paaske UtheimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Elisabet EnglundDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Pathology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Lars B DahlinDepartment of Translational Medicine, Hand Surgery, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Olov RolandssonPublic Health and Clinical Medicine, Family Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Neil LagaliDepartment of Ophthalmology, Sørlandet Hospital Arendal, Arendal, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1079-4361
Oslo University Hospital · NOLinköping University · SELund University · SEUmeå University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a serious complication of diabetes, where skin biopsy assessing intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) plays an important diagnostic role. In vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) of the corneal subbasal nerve plexus has been proposed as a noninvasive diagnostic modality for DPN. Direct comparisons of skin biopsy and IVCM in controlled cohorts are lacking, as IVCM relies on subjective selection of images depicting only 0.2% of the nerve plexus. We compared these diagnostic modalities in a fixed-age cohort of 41 participants with type 2 diabetes and 36 healthy participants using machine algorithms to create wide-field image mosaics and quantify nerves in an area 37 times the size of prior studies to avoid human bias. In the same participants, and at the same time point, no correlation between IENFD and corneal nerve density was found. Corneal nerve density did not correlate with clinical measures of DPN, including neuropathy symptom and disability scores, nerve conduction studies, or quantitative sensory tests. Our findings indicate that corneal and intraepidermal nerves likely mirror different aspects of nerve degeneration, where only intraepidermal nerves appear to reflect the clinical status of DPN, suggesting that scrutiny is warranted concerning methodologies of studies using corneal nerves to assess DPN. ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS: Comparison of intraepidermal nerve fiber density with automated wide-field corneal nerve fiber density in participants with type 2 diabetes revealed no correlation between these parameters. Intraepidermal and corneal nerve fibers both detected neurodegeneration in type 2 diabetes, but only intraepidermal nerve fibers were associated with clinical measures of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. A lack of association of corneal nerves with peripheral neuropathy measures suggests that corneal nerve fibers may be a poor biomarker for diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic NeuropathiesBiopsyCorneaHumansMicroscopy, Confocal

Identifiers

PMID37058418
PMCPMC10281223
OpenAlexW4365482012

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.