ArticleDiabetes2023
Comparison of Novel Wide-Field In Vivo Corneal Confocal Microscopy With Skin Biopsy for Assessing Peripheral Neuropathy in Type 2 Diabetes.
Article in Diabetes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lesion Without Pain, Pain Without Certainty: A Critical Reappraisal of the NeuPSIG Diagnostic Algorithm for Neuropathic Pain.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2026Review
- Review
- Promising Biomarkers for Early Diagnosis: Advances in Understanding the Pathogenesis of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026Review
- Methods for the evaluation of corneal nerve fibres in diabetes mellitus by in vivo confocal microscopy: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Electroacupuncture regulates the P2XPurinergic signalling · 2025Article
- Corneal Nerve Morphology in Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Meta-Analysis of In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Studies.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Peripheral Neuropathy Symptoms and Ocular Surface Lesions in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Dry Eye: A Clinical Correlational Study.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Article
- ConNeCT: weakly supervised corneal confocal microscopy image inpainting network based on a diffusion model.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Research progress of corneal characteristics and changes in primary angle‑closure glaucoma (Review).Biomedical reports · 2025Review
- Quantifying the Corneal Nerve Whorl Pattern.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Advances in diagnostic methods for early-stage diabetic polyneuropathy.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2024Article
- Applications of Imaging Technologies in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy: A Narrative Literature Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Sustained Release of Voriconazole Using 3D-Crosslinked Hydrogel Rings and Rods for Use in Corneal Drug Delivery.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a serious complication of diabetes, where skin biopsy assessing intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) plays an important diagnostic role. In vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) of the corneal subbasal nerve plexus has been proposed as a noninvasive diagnostic modality for DPN. Direct comparisons of skin biopsy and IVCM in controlled cohorts are lacking, as IVCM relies on subjective selection of images depicting only 0.2% of the nerve plexus. We compared these diagnostic modalities in a fixed-age cohort of 41 participants with type 2 diabetes and 36 healthy participants using machine algorithms to create wide-field image mosaics and quantify nerves in an area 37 times the size of prior studies to avoid human bias. In the same participants, and at the same time point, no correlation between IENFD and corneal nerve density was found. Corneal nerve density did not correlate with clinical measures of DPN, including neuropathy symptom and disability scores, nerve conduction studies, or quantitative sensory tests. Our findings indicate that corneal and intraepidermal nerves likely mirror different aspects of nerve degeneration, where only intraepidermal nerves appear to reflect the clinical status of DPN, suggesting that scrutiny is warranted concerning methodologies of studies using corneal nerves to assess DPN. ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS: Comparison of intraepidermal nerve fiber density with automated wide-field corneal nerve fiber density in participants with type 2 diabetes revealed no correlation between these parameters. Intraepidermal and corneal nerve fibers both detected neurodegeneration in type 2 diabetes, but only intraepidermal nerve fibers were associated with clinical measures of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. A lack of association of corneal nerves with peripheral neuropathy measures suggests that corneal nerve fibers may be a poor biomarker for diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.