ArticleClinical oral investigations2023
Transcriptome analysis of human peri-implant soft tissue and periodontal gingiva: a paired design study.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Peri-Implantitis and Periodontitis: Biological Convergence, Contextual Divergence.Journal of periodontal research · 2026Review
- Salivary AQP9 mRNA expression is associated with caries and periodontitis prevalence.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- Predicting interactome networks of up/down regulated proteins and drug-gene interaction analysis associated with peri-implantitis.Dental research journal · 2025Article
- Cystatin SN (CST1) as a Novel Salivary Biomarker of Periodontitis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesLimited information is available about the biological characterization of peri-implant soft tissue at the transcriptional level. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of dental implant on the soft tissue in vivo by using paired samples and compare the differences between peri-implant soft tissue and periodontal gingiva at the transcriptional level.
methodsPaired peri-implant soft tissue and periodontal gingiva tissue from 6 patients were obtained, and the pooled RNAs were analyzed by deep sequencing. Venn diagram was used to further screen out differentially expressed genes in every pair of samples. Annotation and enrichment analysis was performed. Further verification was done by quantitative real-time PCR.
resultsTotally 3549 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were found between peri-implant and periodontal groups. The Venn diagram further identified 185 DEGs in every pair of samples, of which the enrichment analysis identified significant enrichment for cellular component was associated with external side of plasma membrane, for molecular function was protein binding, for biological process was immune system process, and for KEGG pathway was cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction. Among the DEGs, CST1, SPP1, AQP9, and SFRP2 were verified to be upregulated in peri-implant soft tissue.
conclusionsPeri-implant soft tissue showed altered expressions of several genes related to the cell-ECM interaction compared to periodontal gingiva. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Compared to periodontal gingiva, altered cell-ECM interactions in peri-implant may contribute to the susceptibility of peri-implant diseases. At the transcriptional level, periodontal gingiva is generally considered the appropriate control for peri-implantitis, except regarding the cell-ECM interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.