Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37061720›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2023

Recommendations for progression criteria during external randomised pilot trial design, conduct, analysis and reporting.

Katie Mellor, Charlotte Albury, Susan J Dutton, Sandra Eldridge, Sally Hopewell

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 96 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06794632 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Pilot and Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorParker Research InstituteRan2025 to 2025Enrolled32ConditionsHand OsteoarthritisArmsHANDY occupational therapy intervention
NCT07024576 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Preoperative Serial Casting, Stretching, and Massage Therapy Package for Dupuytren's Patients With Severe Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Contracture: A Feasibility Study Protocol for a Randomised Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBournemouth UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled20ConditionsDupuytren&Amp, #39, s Contracture, Dupuytren&AmpArmsPreoperative casting intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Mobile health delivered physical activity after mild stroke or transient ischemic attack: Is it feasible and acceptable?International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2025
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katie MellorOxford Clinical Trials Research Unit / Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England. katie.mellor@ndorms.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4054-5975
Charlotte AlburyNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Susan J DuttonOxford Clinical Trials Research Unit / Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England.
Sandra EldridgeInstitute of Population Health Sciences, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Sally HopewellOxford Clinical Trials Research Unit / Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England.

Funding

MRF MR/N013468/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExternal randomised pilot trials aim to assess whether a future definitive Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) is feasible. Prespecified progression criteria help guide the interpretation of pilot trial findings to decide whether, and how, a definitive RCT should be conducted. This commentary presents a set of proposed recommendations for progression criteria to guide researchers when (i) designing, (ii) conducting, (iii) analysing and (iv) reporting external randomised pilot trials.

methodsRecommendations were developed following a mixed methods approach. This involved (i) a methodological review of pilot trial publications, (ii) a cross-sectional study of pilot trial research funding applications, (iii) qualitative interviews with pilot trial researchers and (iv) a survey of corresponding authors of identified pilot trial publications. Initial recommendations were refined following two consultation stakeholder workshops held in July 2022. Recommendations for progression criteria for external randomised pilot trials: i.

designconsider progression criteria from the earliest opportunity; map progression criteria to feasibility objectives; consider quantitative and qualitative interpretations of feasibility; provide justification; develop guidelines rather than rules; seek input from relevant stakeholders. ii. Conduct: regularly monitor pilot trial data against progression criteria. iii. ANALYSIS: avoid considering each progression criterion in isolation; engage in discussion with relevant stakeholders; consider context and other factors external to the pilot trial; consider feasibility (can we?) and progression (will we?). iv. Reporting: we propose a reporting checklist in relation to progression criteria and recommend reporting in a table format for clarity.

conclusionThese recommendations provide a helpful resource for researchers to consider progression criteria at different stages of external randomised pilot trials. We have produced a simple infographic tool to summarise these recommendations for researchers to refer to. Further research is needed to evaluate whether these proposed recommendations should inform future development, or update, of established guidelines for the design, conduct, analysis and reporting of external randomised pilot trials.

Indexed as

FeasibilityPAFSPilotProgression criteriaRecommendations

Identifiers

PMID37061720
PMCPMC10105402

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.