ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Assessing the predictive value of clinical factors to pathological complete response for locally advanced rectal cancer: An analysis of 124 patients.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating CT-Based Radiomics Analysis With Serum CEA Level to Predict Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Response in Colorectal Cancer.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- MRI-guided risk stratification for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in rectal cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy and Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in the Management of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.Cureus · 2025Article
- Molecular predictors of treatment resistance and recurrence following neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Prognosis and influencing factors of patients with different lymph node statuses after pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- Predictors and Long-Term Outcomes of Pathological Complete Response Following Neoadjuvant Treatment and Radical Surgery for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Development of clinical inflammatory models to predict the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a retrospective study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Article
- Molecular differentiation between complete and incomplete responders to neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer.Research square · 2024Article
- Prediction of pathological complete response and prognosis in locally advanced rectal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- The Predictors of Complete Pathologic Response in Rectal Cancer during the Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Era: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the clinical factors affecting pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Methods: Clinical data of 124 LARC patients treated with nCRT and surgery in the fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from 2014 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. In this study, univariate analysis and logistic dichotomous multivariate regression analysis were used to study the clinical factors affecting pCR, and the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to further verify the accuracy of partial indexes in predicting pCR. Results: Of the 124 enrolled patients, 19 patients (15.32%) achieved pCR. Univariate analysis showed that the number of cycles of consolidation chemotherapy, serum carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) level before treatment, MRI longitudinal length of tumor, and extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) were statistically correlated with pCR. ROC analysis of the longitudinal length of tumor measured by MRI showed that the area under the curve (AUC) value, sensitivity and specificity were 0.735, 89.47% and 48.57% respectively, and the optimal cut-off value was 5.5cm. The ROC analysis showed that the AUC value, sensitivity and specificity of pCR prediction using CEA were 0.741, 63.16% and 90.48%, respectively, and the optimal cut-off value was 3.1ng/ml. Multivariate results showed that the number of cycles of consolidation chemotherapy, serum CEA level before treatment, and EMVI were independent predictors of pCR. Conclusion: The number of cycles of consolidation chemotherapy, serum CEA level before treatment, and EMVI may be important determinants of LARC patients to reach pCR after nCRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.