ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2023
A prognostic assessment predicated by blood culture-based bacteria clustering from real-world evidence: Novel strategies and perspectives on prevention and management of sepsis.
Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Features and 1-Year Prognosis of Patients with Suspected Sepsis and Positive Blood Cultures in the Emergency Department: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Data to diagnosis: Machine learning-aided prediction of bloodstream infections.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis, a syndrome with disturbed host response to severe infection, is a critical health problem worldwide. It is urged to develop and update novel therapeutic strategies for improving the outcome of sepsis. In this study, we demonstrated that different bacteria clustering in sepsis patients may generate differences of prognosis results. We extracted all the sepsis patients from Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV 2.0 (MIMIC-IV 2.0) critical care data set according to certain standards and clinical score, a total of 2,339 patients were included in our study. Then we used multiple data analytics and machine learning methods to make all data deeply analyzed and elucidated. The results showed that the types of bacteria infected by patients with different ages, sex and race are different, the types of bacteria infected by patients with different SIRS values and GCS scores of the first day are different, and the severity of patients with different clusters is different, and most importantly, the survival rate of patients with different clusters also has this significant difference. We concluded prognostic assessment predicated by bacteria clustering might be a relatively potentially novel strategies and perspectives on prevention and management for sepsis in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.