Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37067753›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2023

Contemporary Diagnosis and Management of Patients with MINOCA.

Purvi Parwani, Nicolas Kang, Mary Safaeipour, Mamas A Mamas, Janet Wei, Martha Gulati, Srihari S Naidu, Noel Bairey Merz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary artery disease in a 56-year-old woman.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Purvi ParwaniDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA. pparwani@llu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4707-992X
Nicolas KangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Mary SafaeipourDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Mamas A MamasKeele Cardiovascular Research Group, Institute for Prognosis Research, University of Keele, Keele, UK.
Janet WeiBarbara Streisand Women's Heart Center, Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Martha GulatiBarbara Streisand Women's Heart Center, Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Srihari S NaiduDepartment of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Noel Bairey MerzBarbara Streisand Women's Heart Center, Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewMyocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is defined as acute myocardial infarction (MI) with angiographically no obstructive coronary artery disease or stenosis ≤ 50%. MINOCA is diagnostically challenging and complex, making it difficult to manage effectively. This condition accounts for 6-8% of all MI and poses an increased risk of morbidity and mortality after diagnosis. Prompt recognition and targeted management are essential to improve outcomes and our understanding of this condition, but this process is not yet standardized. This article offers a comprehensive review of MINOCA, delving deep into its unique clinical profile, invasive and noninvasive diagnostic strategies for evaluating MINOCA in light of the lack of widespread availability for comprehensive testing, and current evidence surrounding targeted therapies for patients with MINOCA. RECENT

findingsMINOCA is not uncommon and requires comprehensive assessment using various imaging modalities to evaluate it further. MINOCA is a heterogenous working diagnosis that requires thoughtful approach to diagnose the underlying disease responsible for MINOCA further.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseMyocardial InfarctionCoronary AngiographyCoronary VesselsHumansMINOCARisk FactorsCMDINOCAMicrovascular diseaseMINOCAPETStress CMRVSA

Identifiers

PMID37067753
PMCPMC10188585

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.