Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37073459›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2023

Characterization of the Temporomandibular Joint Disc Complex in the Yucatan Minipig.

Ryan P Donahue, Eston G Kallins, Jerry C Hu, Kyriacos A Athanasiou

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryan P DonahueDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0542-1034
Eston G KallinsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Jerry C HuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Kyriacos A AthanasiouDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc complex (i.e., the TMJ disc and its six attachments) is crucial to everyday functions such as mastication and speaking. The TMJ can be afflicted by many conditions, including disc displacement and defects. Pathologies of the TMJ disc complex most commonly present first as anterior disc displacement, which the field hypothesizes may implicate the two posterior attachments. As a result of anterior disc displacement, defects may develop in the lateral disc complex. Tissue engineering is poised to improve treatment paradigms for these indications of the TMJ disc complex by engineering biomimetic implants, but, first, gold-standard design criteria for such implants should be established through characterization studies. This study's objective was to characterize the structural, mechanical, biochemical, and crosslinking differences among the two posterior attachments and the lateral disc in the Yucatan minipig, a well-accepted TMJ animal model. In tension, it was found that the posterior inferior attachment (PIA) was significantly stiffer and stronger by 2.13 and 2.30 times, respectively, than the posterior superior attachment (PSA). It was found that collagen in both attachments was primarily aligned mediolaterally; however, the lateral disc was much more aligned and anisotropic than either attachment. Among the three locations, the PSA exhibited the greatest degree of heterogeneity and highest proportion of fat vacuoles. The PIA and lateral disc were 1.93 and 1.91 times more collagenous, respectively, by dry weight (DW) than the PSA. The PIA also exhibited 1.78 times higher crosslinking per DW than the PSA. Glycosaminoglycan per DW was significantly higher in the lateral disc by 1.48 and 5.39 times than the PIA and PSA, respectively. Together, these results establish design criteria for tissue-engineering of the TMJ disc complex and indicate that the attachments are less fibrocartilaginous than the disc, while still significantly contributing to the mechanical stability of the TMJ disc complex during articulation. These results also support the biomechanical function of the PIA and PSA, suggesting that the stiffer PIA anchors the disc to the mandibular condyle during articulation, while the softer PSA serves to allow translation over the articular eminence. Impact Statement Characterization of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc complex (i.e., the disc and its attachments) has important implications for those aiming to tissue-engineer functional replacements and can help elucidate its biomechanical function. For example, the findings shown here suggest that the stiffer posterior inferior attachment anchors the disc during articulation, while the softer posterior superior attachment allows translation over the articular eminence.

Indexed as

CollagenTemporomandibular Joint DiscAnimalsGlycosaminoglycansSwineSwine, MiniatureTissue EngineeringCollagenGlycosaminoglycanscharacterizationtissue engineeringTMJ discTMJ disc attachmentsTMJ disc complex

Identifiers

PMID37073459
PMCPMC10440658
OpenAlexW4366352269

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.