Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37077392›Full record

ReviewACS medicinal chemistry letters2023

Using Transcriptomics and Cell Morphology Data in Drug Discovery: The Long Road to Practice.

Lavinia-Lorena Pruteanu, Andreas Bender

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS medicinal chemistry letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. The OASIS Consortium: integrating multi-omics technologies to transform chemical safety assessment.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Old drugs, new challenges: reassigning drugs for cancer therapies.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lavinia-Lorena PruteanuDepartment of Chemistry and Biology, North University Center at Baia Mare, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Victoriei 76, 430122 Baia Mare, Romania.
Andreas BenderCentre for Molecular Informatics, Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6683-7546

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene expression and cell morphology data are high-dimensional biological readouts of much recent interest for drug discovery. They are able to describe biological systems in different states (e.g., healthy and diseased), as well as biological systems before and after compound treatment, and they are hence useful for matching both spaces (e.g., for drug repurposing) as well as for characterizing compounds with respect to efficacy and safety endpoints. This Microperspective describes recent advances in this direction with a focus on applied drug discovery and drug repurposing, as well as outlining what else is needed to advance further, with a particular focus on better understanding the applicability domain of readouts and their relevance for decision making, which is currently often still unclear.

Identifiers

PMID37077392
PMCPMC10107910

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.