Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37079675›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2023

The evolution of two transmissible cancers in Tasmanian devils.

Maximilian R Stammnitz, Kevin Gori, Young Mi Kwon, Edward Harry, Fergal J Martin, Konstantinos Billis, Yuanyuan Cheng, Adrian Baez-Ortega, William Chow, Sebastien Comte and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Loss-of-function mutations inBiology letters · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Divergent somatic mutation patterns among human cerebellar neuron types.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Horizontal transfer of nuclear DNA in transmissible cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Maximilian R StammnitzTransmissible Cancer Group, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1704-9199
Kevin GoriTransmissible Cancer Group, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7975-4275
Young Mi KwonTransmissible Cancer Group, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0436-603X
Edward HarryWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1914-6432
Fergal J MartinEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1672-050X
Konstantinos BillisEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8568-4306
Yuanyuan ChengSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1747-9308
Adrian Baez-OrtegaTransmissible Cancer Group, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
William ChowWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9056-201X
Sebastien ComteSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7984-8159
Hannes EggertssondeCODE Genetics Inc., Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0002-1674-9978
Samantha FoxSave the Tasmanian Devil Program, Tasmanian Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Hobart, TAS, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0371-3458
Rodrigo HamedeSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1526-225X
Menna JonesSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7558-9022
Billie LazenbySave the Tasmanian Devil Program, Tasmanian Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Hobart, TAS, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3328-0670
Sarah PeckSave the Tasmanian Devil Program, Tasmanian Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Ruth PyeMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1001-3329
Michael A QuailWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3861-0483
Kate SwiftMount Pleasant Laboratories, Tasmanian Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Prospect, TAS, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1147-7010
Jinhong WangTransmissible Cancer Group, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0809-9856
Jonathan WoodWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7545-2162
Kerstin HoweWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2237-513X
Michael R StrattonWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.
Zemin NingWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.
Elizabeth P MurchisonTransmissible Cancer Group, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7462-8907

Funding

Evolution of cancer transmissionR01GM126563 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI STORFER, ANDREW T · 2017 to 2020
$2.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM126563Wellcome Trust 102942Wellcome Trust 108749Wellcome Trust 222551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tasmanian devils have spawned two transmissible cancer lineages, named devil facial tumor 1 (DFT1) and devil facial tumor 2 (DFT2). We investigated the genetic diversity and evolution of these clones by analyzing 78 DFT1 and 41 DFT2 genomes relative to a newly assembled, chromosome-level reference. Time-resolved phylogenetic trees reveal that DFT1 first emerged in 1986 (1982 to 1989) and DFT2 in 2011 (2009 to 2012). Subclone analysis documents transmission of heterogeneous cell populations. DFT2 has faster mutation rates than DFT1 across all variant classes, including substitutions, indels, rearrangements, transposable element insertions, and copy number alterations, and we identify a hypermutated DFT1 lineage with defective DNA mismatch repair. Several loci show plausible evidence of positive selection in DFT1 or DFT2, including loss of chromosome Y and inactivation of

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularFacial NeoplasmsMarsupialiaSelection, GeneticAnimalsGenomePhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID37079675
PMCPMC7614631

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.