Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37084184›Full record

ReviewThe International journal of eating disorders2023

Integrating aspects of affect, reward, and cognition to develop more comprehensive models of binge-eating pathology.

Lauren M Schaefer, Glen Forester, Robert D Dvorak, Joanna Steinglass, Stephen A Wonderlich

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The International journal of eating disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Reward Processing in Binge Eating and Harmful Drinking: A Systematic Review.The International journal of eating disorders · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Back to the future: Progressing memory research in eating disorders.The International journal of eating disorders · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren M SchaeferCenter for Biobehavioral Research, Sanford Research, North Dakota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9907-7598
Glen ForesterCenter for Biobehavioral Research, Sanford Research, North Dakota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1738-7163
Robert D DvorakCenter for Biobehavioral Research, Sanford Research, North Dakota, USA.
Joanna SteinglassDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8434-8212
Stephen A WonderlichCenter for Biobehavioral Research, Sanford Research, North Dakota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0659-153X
University of North Dakota · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USSanford Research · USUniversity of Central Florida · US

Funding

The Neurocognitive Reward Learning Mechanisms of Binge EatingP20GM134969 · NIGMS · SANFORD RESEARCH NORTH · PI WONDERLICH, STEPHEN ARTHUR · 2021 to 2025
$11.5M
Regional Postdoctoral Training Grant in Eating Disorders ResearchT32MH082761 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CAROL B. PETERSON · 2009 to 2026
$6.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM134969NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH082761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reward-related processes are an increasing focus of eating disorders research. Although evidence suggests that numerous distinct reward processes may contribute to eating pathology (e.g., reward learning and delay discounting), existing etiological models of reward dysfunction tend to focus on only a limited number of reward processes, and frequently lack specificity when identifying the individual reward processes hypothesized to contribute to dysregulated eating behavior. Moreover, existing theories have been limited in their integration of reward-related processes with other demonstrated risk and maintenance factors for eating disorders (e.g., affect and cognition), potentially contributing to underdeveloped models of eating pathology. In this article, we highlight five distinct reward processes with theorized or demonstrated relevance to eating disorders involving binge-eating, followed by a review of two well-established risk/maintenance factors for binge-eating pathology. We then introduce two novel models of binge eating onset and maintenance that integrate these factors (i.e., the Affect, Reward, Cognition models), and discuss methods for testing each of the models in future research. Ultimately, we hope that the proposed models provide a springboard for the continued evolution of more precise and comprehensive theories of reward dysfunction in the eating disorders, as well as the development of novel intervention approaches. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Eating disorders are associated with abnormalities in multiple domains of reward functioning. However, models of reward dysfunction within the eating disorders have not been well-integrated with prominent models of affect and cognition. This article presents two novel models of onset and maintenance for binge-eating pathology, which attempt to integrate observed reward abnormalities with other affective and cognitive processes implicated in binge-type eating disorders.

Indexed as

Binge-Eating DisorderBulimiaCognitionHumansRewardRisk Factorsaffectbinge eatinginhibitory controlmaintenanceonsetreward

Identifiers

PMID37084184
PMCPMC10681362
OpenAlexW4366603675

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.