Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37085526›Full record

Observational studyNutrition & diabetes2023

Multi-omics signatures in new-onset diabetes predict metabolic response to dietary inulin: findings from an observational study followed by an interventional trial.

N Ďásková, I Modos, M Krbcová, M Kuzma, H Pelantová, J Hradecký, M Heczková, M Bratová, P Videňská, P Šplíchalová and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Nutrition & diabetes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Illuminating diabetesWorld journal of diabetes · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Diagnosing and engineering gut microbiomes.EMBO molecular medicine · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The Ambiguous Correlation ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

N ĎáskováFirst Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
I ModosInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
M KrbcováDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7376-611X
M KuzmaInstitute of Microbiology of the CAS, Prague, Czech Republic.
H PelantováInstitute of Microbiology of the CAS, Prague, Czech Republic.
J HradeckýFaculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
M HeczkováInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
M BratováInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
P VideňskáMendel University, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Brno, Czech Republic.
P ŠplíchalováRECETOX, Faculty of Science Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
M KrálováAmbis University, Department of Economics and Management, Prague, Czech Republic.
M HenikováDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-3253-0853
J PotočkováDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
A OuřadováDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
R LandbergDivision of Food and Nutrition Science, Department of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Goteborg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6399-7608
T Kühn *Institute of Global Food Security, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
M Cahová *Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic. monika.cahova@ikem.cz.ORCID 0000-0003-2640-5084
J Gojda *Department of Internal Medicine, Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-7995-5947
Charles University · CZInstitute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Microbiology · CZChalmers University of Technology · SECzech University of Life Sciences Prague · CZMasaryk University · CZMendel University in Brno · CZQueen's University Belfast · GB

Funding

European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes (EFSD) mentorship program supported by Astra Zeneca
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe metabolic performance of the gut microbiota contributes to the onset of type 2 diabetes. However, targeted dietary interventions are limited by the highly variable inter-individual response. We hypothesized (1) that the composition of the complex gut microbiome and metabolome (MIME) differ across metabolic spectra (lean-obese-diabetes); (2) that specific MIME patterns could explain the differential responses to dietary inulin; and (3) that the response can be predicted based on baseline MIME signature and clinical characteristics.

methodForty-nine patients with newly diagnosed pre/diabetes (DM), 66 metabolically healthy overweight/obese (OB), and 32 healthy lean (LH) volunteers were compared in a cross-sectional case-control study integrating clinical variables, dietary intake, gut microbiome, and fecal/serum metabolomes (16 S rRNA sequencing, metabolomics profiling). Subsequently, 27 DM were recruited for a predictive study: 3 months of dietary inulin (10 g/day) intervention.

resultsMIME composition was different between groups. While the DM and LH groups represented opposite poles of the abundance spectrum, OB was closer to DM. Inulin supplementation was associated with an overall improvement in glycemic indices, though the response was very variable, with a shift in microbiome composition toward a more favorable profile and increased serum butyric and propionic acid concentrations. The improved glycemic outcomes of inulin treatment were dependent on better baseline glycemic status and variables related to the gut microbiota, including the abundance of certain bacterial taxa (i.e., Blautia, Eubacterium halii group, Lachnoclostridium, Ruminiclostridium, Dialister, or Phascolarctobacterium), serum concentrations of branched-chain amino acid derivatives and asparagine, and fecal concentrations of indole and several other volatile organic compounds.

conclusionWe demonstrated that obesity is a stronger determinant of different MIME patterns than impaired glucose metabolism. The large inter-individual variability in the metabolic effects of dietary inulin was explained by differences in baseline glycemic status and MIME signatures. These could be further validated to personalize nutritional interventions in patients with newly diagnosed diabetes.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2InulinCase-Control StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMultiomicsObesityOverweightInulin

Identifiers

PMID37085526
PMCPMC10121613
OpenAlexW4366742594

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.