Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37086374›Full record

ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2023

Highlights of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Studies Presented at the 2023 American College of Cardiology Conference.

Kartik Gupta, Isabel Balachandran, Jacob Foy, Melody Hermel, Azka Latif, Chayakrit Krittanawong, Leandro Slipczuk, Farhala Baloch, Zainab Samad, Salim S Virani

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Kartik GuptaDepartment of Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9476-9264
Isabel BalachandranThe Texas Heart Institute, Houston, TX, USA.
Jacob FoyDepartment of Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Melody HermelDivision of Cardiology, United Medical Doctors, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Azka LatifSection of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Chayakrit KrittanawongCardiology Division, NYU Langone Health and NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Leandro SlipczukDivision of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, , Bronx, NY, USA.
Farhala BalochSection of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Zainab SamadSection of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Salim S ViraniThe Texas Heart Institute, Houston, TX, USA. salim.virani@aku.edu.
Aga Khan University · PKHenry Ford Hospital · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USBaylor College of Medicine · USDoctors Medical Center · USNYU Langone Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo summarize selected late-breaking science on cardiovascular (CV) disease prevention presented at the 2023 American College of Cardiology (ACC) conference. RECENT

findingsThe CLEAR outcomes randomized control trial (RCT) compared bempedoic acid to placebo in patients at high-risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) or prevalent CVD and statin intolerance for CV outcomes. The YELLOW III was a single-arm study that evaluated the effect of Evolocumab on coronary plaque characteristics in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). A cohort evaluated the association between a self-reported low-carbohydrate high-fat (ketogenic) diet and serum lipid levels as compared to a standard diet. The LOADSTAR trial compared CV outcomes with targeted low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) approach vs. high-intensity statin in patients with CAD. The PCDS statin cluster randomized trial compared the effectiveness of an electronic reminder to the clinician on a high-intensity statin use among patients with a history of ASCVD as compared to no reminder. A prospective cohort study compared the extent of coronary atherosclerosis among lifelong endurance athletes and healthy non-athletes. A causal artificial intelligence study combined polygenic risk scores with data from large CV prevention RCTs to guide systolic blood pressure and LDL-C reduction targets to reach average CV risk. The ACCESS trial evaluated the impact of eliminating copayment for low-income older adults in Canada with chronic CV diseases on composite CV outcomes. A pooled analysis of 3 large RCTs evaluated the association between residual inflammatory risk and CV outcomes, as compared to residual elevated cholesterol risk in patients receiving statin therapy. A Phase 2B RCT compared the efficacy of an oral PCSK9i, MK-0616, in reducing LDL-C as compared to a placebo. The late-breaking clinical science presented at the 2023 conference of the ACC paves the way for an evidence-based alternative to statin therapy and provides data on several common clinical scenarios encountered in daily practice.

Indexed as

Anticholesteremic AgentsCardiologyCardiovascular DiseasesCoronary Artery DiseaseHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsAgedCholesterol, LDLHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUnited StatesAnticholesteremic AgentsCholesterol, LDLHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsACCESSBempedoic acidCLEARLOADSTARPCDSYELLOW

Identifiers

PMID37086374
OpenAlexW4366742222

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.