Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37089129›Full record

ArticleImplementation research and practice

A scoping review of strategies for financing the implementation of evidence-based practices in behavioral health systems: State of the literature and future directions.

Alex R Dopp, Marie-Rachelle Narcisse, Peter Mundey, Jane F Silovsky, Allison B Smith, David Mandell, Beverly W Funderburk, Byron J Powell, Susan Schmidt, Daniel Edwards and 2 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation research and practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alex R DoppDepartment of Behavioral and Policy Sciences, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2522-6546
Marie-Rachelle NarcisseDepartment of Community Health and Research, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Peter MundeyDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Savannah State University, Savannah, GA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7711-0641
Jane F SilovskyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Allison B SmithDepartment of Psychological Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
David MandellDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Beverly W FunderburkDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6524-2383
Byron J PowellBrown School, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Susan SchmidtDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Daniel EdwardsEvidence-Based Associates, Alexandria, VA, USA.
Douglas LukeBrown School, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Peter MendelDepartment of Economics, Sociology, and Statistics, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.

Funding

IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES IRI-MHSR25MH080916 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Byron James Powell · 2009 to 2026
$3.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH080916
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Increased availability of evidence-based practices (EBPs) is essential to alleviating the negative public health and societal effects of behavioral health problems. A major challenge to implementing and sustaining EBPs broadly is the limited and fragmented nature of available funding. Method: We conducted a scoping review that assessed the current state of evidence on EBP financing strategies for behavioral health based on recent literature (i.e., post-Affordable Care Act). We defined financing strategies as techniques that secure and direct financial resources to support EBP implementation. This article introduces a conceptualization of financing strategies and then presents a compilation of identified strategies, following established reporting guidelines for the implementation strategies. We also describe the reported level of use for each financing strategy in the research literature. Results: Of 23 financing strategies, 13 were reported as being used within behavioral health services, 4 had potential for use, 5 had conceptual use only, and 1 was potentially contraindicated. Examples of strategies reported being used include increased fee-for-service reimbursement, grants, cost sharing, and pay-for-success contracts. No strategies had been evaluated in ways that allowed for strong conclusions about their impact on EBP implementation outcomes. Conclusion: The existing literature on EBP financing strategies in behavioral health raises far more questions than answers. Therefore, we propose a research agenda that will help better understand these financing strategies. We also discuss the implications of our findings for behavioral health professionals, system leaders, and policymakers who want to develop robust, sustainable financing for EBP implementation in behavioral health systems. Plain language abstract: Organizations that treat behavioral health problems (mental health and substance use) often seek to adopt and use evidence-based practices (EBPs). A challenge to adopting EBPs broadly is the limited funding available, often from various sources that are poorly coordinated with one another. To help organizations plan effectively to adopt EBPs, we conducted a review of recent evidence (i.e., since the passage of the 2010 Affordable Care Act) on strategies for financing EBP adoption in behavioral health systems. We present definitions of 23 identified strategies and describe each strategy's reported (in the research literature) level of use to fund EBP adoption in behavioral health services. Of the 23 financing strategies, 13 strategies had evidence of use, 4 had potential for use, 5 had conceptual use only, and 1 was potentially contraindicated. Examples of strategies with evidence of use include increased fee-for-service reimbursement, grants, cost sharing, and pay-for-success contracts. This comprehensive list of EBP financing strategies may help guide decision-making by behavioral health professionals, system leaders, and policymakers. The article also presents a research agenda for building on the current research literature by (1) advancing methods to evaluate financing strategies' effects, (2) partnering with stakeholders and decision-makers to examine promising financing strategies, (3) focusing on strategies and service systems with the greatest needs, (4) improving methods to guide the selection of financing strategies, and (5) paying greater attention to sustainable long-term financing of EBPs.

Indexed as

behavioral health systemsevidence-based practiceFinancing strategiesimplementationsustainment

Identifiers

PMID37089129
PMCPMC9924261

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.