Effect of botanical drugs in improving symptoms of hypertensive nephropathy: Analysis of real-world data, retrospective cohort, network, and experimental assessment.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Advance on Chinese Medicine for Hypertensive Renal Damage: Focus on the Complex Molecular Mechanisms.Chinese journal of integrative medicine · 2024
   Review
2. Targeting lipid reprogramming in the tumor microenvironment by traditional Chinese medicines as a potential cancer treatment.Heliyon · 2024
   Review
3. JiangyaTongluo decoction ameliorates tubulointerstitial fibrosis via regulating the SIRT1/PGC-1α/mitophagy axis in hypertensive nephropathy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as