Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37091075›Full record

ArticleImplementation research and practice

Training primary health care providers in Colombia, Mexico and Peru to increase alcohol screening: Mixed-methods process evaluation of implementation strategy.

Daša Kokole, Eva Jané-Llopis, Guillermina Natera Rey, Natalia Bautista Aguilar, Perla Sonia Medina Aguilar, Juliana Mejía-Trujillo, Katherine Mora, Natalia Restrepo, Ines Bustamante, Marina Piazza and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation research and practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 7 institutions in 8 countries.

Daša KokoleDepartment of Health Promotion, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, POB 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7260-8064
Eva Jané-LlopisDepartment of Health Promotion, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, POB 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Guillermina Natera ReyInstituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz, Calz México-Xochimilco 101, Huipulco, 14370 Ciudad de México, CDMX, Mexico.
Natalia Bautista AguilarInstituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz, Calz México-Xochimilco 101, Huipulco, 14370 Ciudad de México, CDMX, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3289-4259
Perla Sonia Medina AguilarInstituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz, Calz México-Xochimilco 101, Huipulco, 14370 Ciudad de México, CDMX, Mexico.
Juliana Mejía-TrujilloCorporación Nuevos Rumbos, Calle 108 A # 4-15, Bogotá, Colombia.
Katherine MoraCorporación Nuevos Rumbos, Calle 108 A # 4-15, Bogotá, Colombia.
Natalia RestrepoCorporación Nuevos Rumbos, Calle 108 A # 4-15, Bogotá, Colombia.
Ines BustamanteSchool of Public Health and Administration, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Ave. Honorio Delgado 430, Urb. Ingeniería, S.M.P. Lima - Perú.
Marina PiazzaSchool of Public Health and Administration, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Ave. Honorio Delgado 430, Urb. Ingeniería, S.M.P. Lima - Perú.
Amy O'DonnellPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK.
Adriana SoloveiDepartment of Health Promotion, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, POB 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Liesbeth MerckenDepartment of Health Promotion, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, POB 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Christiane Sybille SchmidtCentre for Interdisciplinary Addiction Research (ZIS), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Hugo Lopez-PelayoAddictions Unit, Psychiatry Dept, Hospital Clínic, Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Silvia MatraiAddictions Unit, Psychiatry Dept, Hospital Clínic, Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Fleur BraddickAddictions Unit, Psychiatry Dept, Hospital Clínic, Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Antoni GualAddictions Unit, Psychiatry Dept, Hospital Clínic, Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Jürgen RehmInstitute for Mental Health Policy Research, CAMH, 33 Russell Street, Toronto, ON M5S 2S1, Canada.
Peter AndersonDepartment of Health Promotion, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, POB 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Hein de VriesDepartment of Health Promotion, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, POB 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESInstituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz · MXUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia · PENewcastle University · GBSechenov University · RUUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Initial results from the SCALA study demonstrated that training primary health care providers is an effective implementation strategy to increase alcohol screening in Colombia, Mexico and Peru, but did not show evidence of superior performance for the standard compared to the shorter training arm. This paper elaborates on those outcomes by examining the relationship of training-related process evaluation indicators with the alcohol screening practice. Methods: A mix of convergent and exploratory mixed-methods design was employed. Data sources included training documentation, post-training questionnaires, observation forms, self-report forms and interviews. Available quantitative data were compared on outcome measure - providers' alcohol screening. Results: Training reach was high: three hundred fifty-two providers (72.3% of all eligible) participated in one or more training or booster sessions. Country differences in session length reflected adaptation to previous topic knowledge and experience of the providers. Overall, 49% of attendees conducted alcohol screening in practice. A higher dose received was positively associated with screening, but there was no difference between standard and short training arms. Although the training sessions were well received by participants, satisfaction with training and perceived utility for practice were not associated with screening. Profession, but not age or gender, was associated with screening: in Colombia and Mexico, doctors and psychologists were more likely to screen (although the latter represented only a small proportion of the sample) and in Peru, only psychologists. Conclusions: The SCALA training programme was well received by the participants and led to half of the participating providers conducting alcohol screening in their primary health care practice. The dose received and the professional role were the key factors associated with conducting the alcohol screening in practice.

Indexed as

alcoholdepressionimplementationmiddle-incomeprimary health careprocess evaluationscreeningtraining

Identifiers

PMID37091075
PMCPMC9924276
OpenAlexW4285613051

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.