ReviewPathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023
[Classification of indolent B-cell lymphomas : Novelties and open questions].
Review in Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The 5th edition of the WHO classification (WHO-HAEM5) and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) have considerable overlap but also some distinct differences in categorizing indolent B‑cell lymphomas. Most differences with the expected impact on the daily diagnostic routine relate to follicular lymphoma (FL). Grading of FL remains mandatory only in the ICC; a diffuse growth pattern in an FL with > 15 blasts per high-power field (FL grade 3A) is not automatically classified as DLBCL according to WHO-HAEM5, and an FL subtype with unusual morphology (blastoid or large centrocyte) and biology is recognized as an entity only in the WHO-HAEM5. With the exception of B‑prolymphocytic leukemia, which is no longer acknowledged in WHO-HAEM5, there are only minor differences between both classifications and include updated names of entities, improved diagnostic criteria, and upgrades from provisional to definite entities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.