Evidence mapPaperPMID 37100545Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Digital health2023

Digital health and telehealth in cancer care: a scoping review of reviews.

Kelly M Shaffer, Kea L Turner, Chelsea Siwik, Brian D Gonzalez, Rujula Upasani, Jillian V Glazer, Robert J Ferguson, Catherine Joshua, Carissa A Low

Registry-linked trialAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06231537 (Visual Oral Examination in Primary Health Care for Early Detection of Oral Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 137 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
137citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06231537 nacompletednot on this map

Visual Oral Examination in Primary Health Care for Early Detection of Oral Cancer: Targeting High-Risk Individuals in the Municipality of Rio de Janeiro

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroRan2023 to 2024Enrolled1,152ConditionsMouth NeoplasmsArmsVisual oral examination
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

137 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Effectiveness of virtual delivery of cancer education for patients: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Geographic access as a modifiable determinant of cancer care: perspectives on hub-and-spoke oncology networks, travel burden and time toxicity.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article

77 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kelly M ShafferCenter for Behavioral Health and Technology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. Electronic address: kshaffer@virginia.edu.
Kea L TurnerDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Chelsea SiwikOsher Center for Integrative Health, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Brian D GonzalezDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Rujula UpasaniCenter for Behavioral Health and Technology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Jillian V GlazerCenter for Behavioral Health and Technology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Robert J FergusonDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Catherine JoshuaCenter for Behavioral Health and Technology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Carissa A LowDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Funding

Tissue CoreP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · 1998 to 2025
$32.8M
VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · 1988 to 2025
$32.4M
Training Researchers in Clinical Integrative Medicine (TRIM)T32AT003997 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · 2022 to 2025
$641k
A mobile sensing system to monitor symptoms during chemotherapyR37CA242545 · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · 2025 to 2025
$359k
NCCIH NIH HHS L30 AT011624NCCIH NIH HHS T32 AT003997NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292NCI NIH HHS R37 CA242545
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated remote cancer care delivery via the internet and telephone, rapidly accelerating an already growing care delivery model and associated research. This scoping review of reviews characterised the peer-reviewed literature reviews on digital health and telehealth interventions in cancer published from database inception up to May 1, 2022, from PubMed, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Cochrane Reviews, and Web of Science. Eligible reviews conducted a systematic literature search. Data were extracted in duplicate via a pre-defined online survey. Following screening, 134 reviews met the eligibility criteria. 77 of those reviews were published since 2020. 128 reviews summarised interventions intended for patients, 18 addressed family caregivers, and five addressed health-care providers. 56 reviews did not target a specific phase of the cancer continuum, whereas 48 reviews tended to address the active treatment phase. 29 reviews included a meta-analysis, with results showing positive effects on quality of life, psychological outcomes, and screening behaviours. 83 reviews did not report intervention implementation outcomes but when reported, 36 reported acceptability, 32 feasibility, and 29 fidelity outcomes. Several notable gaps were identified in these literature reviews on digital health and telehealth in cancer care. No reviews specifically addressed older adults, bereavement, or sustainability of interventions and only two reviews focused on comparing telehealth to in-person interventions. Addressing these gaps with rigorous systematic reviews might help guide continued innovation in remote cancer care, particularly for older adults and bereaved families, and integrate and sustain these interventions within oncology.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeoplasmsTelemedicineAgedDelivery of Health CareHumansPandemicsQuality of LifeReview Literature as Topic

Identifiers

PMID37100545
PMCPMC10124999

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.