Evidence mapPaperPMID 37101178Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2023

Genetic evidence implicating natriuretic peptide receptor-3 in cardiovascular disease risk: a Mendelian randomization study.

Héléne T Cronjé, Ville Karhunen, G Kees Hovingh, Ken Coppieters, Jens O Lagerstedt, Michael Nyberg, Dipender Gill

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Héléne T CronjéDepartment of Public Health, Section of Epidemiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. toinet.cronje@sund.ku.dk.
Ville KarhunenFaculty of Science, Research Unit of Mathematical Sciences, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
G Kees HovinghDepartment of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ken CoppietersGlobal Project Management, Global Drug Discovery, Novo Nordisk, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jens O LagerstedtRare Endocrine Disorders, Research and Early Development, Novo Nordisk, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Michael NybergVascular Biology, Research and Early Development, Novo Nordisk, Maaloev, Denmark.
Dipender GillChief Scientific Advisor Office, Research and Early Development, Novo Nordisk, Copenhagen, Denmark. dipender.gill@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7312-7078
Novo Nordisk (Denmark) · DKLund University · SEUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Oulu · FI

Funding

British Heart Foundation RE/18/4/34215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundC-type natriuretic peptide (CNP) is a known target for promoting growth and has been implicated as a therapeutic opportunity for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study aimed to explore the effect of CNP on CVD risk using the Mendelian randomization (MR) framework.

methodsInstrumental variables mimicking the effects of pharmacological intervention on CNP were identified as uncorrelated genetic variants located in the genes coding for its primary receptors, natriuretic peptide receptors-2 and 3 (NPR2 and NPR3), that associated with height. We performed MR and colocalization analyses to investigate the effects of NPR2 signalling and NPR3 function on CVD outcomes and risk factors. MR estimates were compared to those obtained when considering height variants from throughout the genome.

resultsGenetically-proxied reduced NPR3 function was associated with a lower risk of CVD, with odds ratio (OR) 0.74 per standard deviation (SD) higher NPR3-predicted height, and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.64-0.86. This effect was greater in magnitude than observed when considering height variants from throughout the genome. For CVD subtypes, similar MR associations for NPR3-predicted height were observed when considering the outcomes of coronary artery disease (0.75, 95% CI 0.60-0.92), stroke (0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.95) and heart failure (0.77, 95% CI 0.58-1.02). Consideration of CVD risk factors identified systolic blood pressure (SBP) as a potential mediator of the NPR3-related CVD risk lowering. For stroke, we found that the MR estimate for NPR3 was greater in magnitude than could be explained by a genetically predicted SBP effect alone. Colocalization results largely supported the MR findings, with no evidence of results being driven by effects due to variants in linkage disequilibrium. There was no MR evidence supporting effects of NPR2 on CVD risk, although this null finding could be attributable to fewer genetic variants being identified to instrument this target.

conclusionsThis genetic analysis supports the cardioprotective effects of pharmacologically inhibiting NPR3 receptor function, which is only partly mediated by an effect on blood pressure. There was unlikely sufficient statistical power to investigate the cardioprotective effects of NPR2 signalling.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesStrokeGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMendelian Randomization AnalysisNatriuretic PeptidesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReceptors, Atrial Natriuretic FactorNatriuretic PeptidesReceptors, Atrial Natriuretic FactorBlood pressureCardiovascular diseaseC-type natriuretic peptideGenetic epidemiologyMendelian randomizationNPR2NPR3

Identifiers

PMID37101178
PMCPMC10134514
OpenAlexW4367049138

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.