Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37101221›Full record

ArticleStem cell research & therapy2023

In vitro erythrocyte production using human-induced pluripotent stem cells: determining the best hematopoietic stem cell sources.

Youn Keong Cho, Hyun-Kyung Kim, Soon Sung Kwon, Su-Hee Jeon, June-Won Cheong, Ki Taek Nam, Han-Soo Kim, Sinyoung Kim, Hyun Ok Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Red blood cells: a potential delivery system.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Youn Keong ChoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyun-Kyung KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Soon Sung KwonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Su-Hee JeonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
June-Won CheongDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ki Taek NamSeverance Biomedical Science Institute, Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Han-Soo KimDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medical Convergence, Gangneung-si, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea.
Sinyoung KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. sykim@yuhs.ac.
Hyun Ok KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. hyunok1019@yuhs.ac.
Yonsei University · KRCatholic Kwandong University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlood transfusion is an essential part of medicine. However, many countries have been facing a national blood crisis. To address this ongoing blood shortage issue, there have been efforts to generate red blood cells (RBCs) in vitro, especially from human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs). However, the best source of hiPSCs for this purpose is yet to be determined.

methodsIn this study, hiPSCs were established from three different hematopoietic stem cell sources-peripheral blood (PB), cord blood (CB) and bone marrow (BM) aspirates (n = 3 for each source)-using episomal reprogramming vectors and differentiated into functional RBCs. Various time-course studies including immunofluorescence assay, quantitative real-time PCR, flow cytometry, karyotyping, morphological analysis, oxygen binding capacity analysis, and RNA sequencing were performed to examine and compare the characteristics of hiPSCs and hiPSC-differentiated erythroid cells.

resultshiPSC lines were established from each of the three sources and were found to be pluripotent and have comparable characteristics. All hiPSCs differentiated into erythroid cells, but there were discrepancies in differentiation and maturation efficiencies: CB-derived hiPSCs matured into erythroid cells the fastest while PB-derived hiPSCs required a longer time for maturation but showed the highest degree of reproducibility. BM-derived hiPSCs gave rise to diverse types of cells and exhibited poor differentiation efficiency. Nonetheless, erythroid cells differentiated from all hiPSC lines mainly expressed fetal and/or embryonic hemoglobin, indicating that primitive erythropoiesis occurred. Their oxygen equilibrium curves were all left-shifted.

conclusionsCollectively, both PB- and CB-derived hiPSCs were favorably reliable sources for the clinical production of RBCs in vitro, despite several challenges that need to be overcome. However, owing to the limited availability and the large amount of CB required to produce hiPSCs, and the results of this study, the advantages of using PB-derived hiPSCs for RBC production in vitro may outweigh those of using CB-derived hiPSCs. We believe that our findings will facilitate the selection of optimal hiPSC lines for RBC production in vitro in the near future.

Indexed as

Induced Pluripotent Stem CellsCell DifferentiationErythrocytesErythropoiesisHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansReproducibility of ResultsErythropoiesisHematopoietic stem cellsHuman-induced pluripotent stem cellRed blood cell

Identifiers

PMID37101221
PMCPMC10132444
OpenAlexW4367048957

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.