Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37105977›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Body composition predicts hypertension using machine learning methods: a cohort study.

Mohammad Ali Nematollahi, Soodeh Jahangiri, Arefeh Asadollahi, Maryam Salimi, Azizallah Dehghan, Mina Mashayekh, Mohamad Roshanzamir, Ghazal Gholamabbas, Roohallah Alizadehsani, Mehdi Bazrafshan and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mediating Role of Insulin Resistance in the Association Between Body Composition and Hypertension.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammad Ali NematollahiDepartment of Computer Sciences, Fasa University, Fasa, Iran.
Soodeh JahangiriStudent Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Arefeh AsadollahiNon Communicable Diseases Research Center, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
Maryam SalimiStudent Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Azizallah DehghanNon Communicable Diseases Research Center, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
Mina MashayekhStudent Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mohamad RoshanzamirDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Fasa University, Fasa, 74617-81189, Iran.
Ghazal GholamabbasStudent Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Roohallah AlizadehsaniInstitute for Intelligent Systems Research and Innovation (IISRI), Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Mehdi BazrafshanShiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Hanieh BazrafshanDepartment of Neurology, Clinical Neurology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Hamed Bazrafshan DrissiCardiovascular Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, PO Box: 71348-14336, Shiraz, Iran. hamedbazrafshan@yahoo.com.
Sheikh Mohammed Shariful IslamInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IRFasa University of Medical Sciences · IRDeakin University · AUShiraz University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We used machine learning methods to investigate if body composition indices predict hypertension. Data from a cohort study was used, and 4663 records were included (2156 were male, 1099 with hypertension, with the age range of 35-70 years old). Body composition analysis was done using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA); weight, basal metabolic rate, total and regional fat percentage (FATP), and total and regional fat-free mass (FFM) were measured. We used machine learning methods such as Support Vector Classifier, Decision Tree, Stochastic Gradient Descend Classifier, Logistic Regression, Gaussian Naïve Bayes, K-Nearest Neighbor, Multi-Layer Perceptron, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Histogram-based Gradient Boosting, Bagging, Extra Tree, Ada Boost, Voting, and Stacking to classify the investigated cases and find the most relevant features to hypertension. FATP, AFFM, BMR, FFM, TRFFM, AFATP, LFATP, and older age were the top features in hypertension prediction. Arm FFM, basal metabolic rate, total FFM, Trunk FFM, leg FFM, and male gender were inversely associated with hypertension, but total FATP, arm FATP, leg FATP, older age, trunk FATP, and female gender were directly associated with hypertension. AutoMLP, stacking and voting methods had the best performance for hypertension prediction achieving an accuracy rate of 90%, 84% and 83%, respectively. By using machine learning methods, we found that BIA-derived body composition indices predict hypertension with acceptable accuracy.

Indexed as

Body CompositionMachine LearningAdultAgedBayes TheoremCohort StudiesElectric ImpedanceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID37105977
PMCPMC10140285
OpenAlexW4367181045

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.