Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37107544›Full record

ArticleGenes2023

Personal Genomes in Practice: Exploring Citizen and Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on Personalized Genomic Medicine and Personal Health Data Spaces Using a Mixed-Methods Design.

Judith Tommel, Daan Kenis, Nathalie Lambrechts, Richard M Brohet, Jordy Swysen, Lotte Mollen, Marie-José F Hoefmans, Murih Pusparum, Andrea W M Evers, Gökhan Ertaylan and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Judith TommelHealth, Medical, and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333 AK Leiden, The Netherlands.
Daan KenisDepartment of Philosophy, University of Antwerp, Rodestraat 14, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.
Nathalie LambrechtsVITO Health, Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1896-0483
Richard M BrohetDepartment of Epidemiology and Statistics, Isala Hospital, Dokter van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB Zwolle, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4472-9322
Jordy SwysenVITO Health, Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium.
Lotte MollenVITO Health, Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium.
Marie-José F HoefmansSchluss, Overhoeksplein 2, 1031 KS Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Murih PusparumVITO Health, Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium.
Andrea W M EversHealth, Medical, and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333 AK Leiden, The Netherlands.
Gökhan ErtaylanVITO Health, Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5602-6435
Marco RoosDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8691-772X
Kristien HensDepartment of Philosophy, University of Antwerp, Rodestraat 14, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1062-7918
Elisa J F HouwinkDepartment of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 221 Fourth Avenue SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9927-7266

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ongoing health challenges, such as the increased global burden of chronic disease, are increasingly answered by calls for personalized approaches to healthcare. Genomic medicine, a vital component of these personalization strategies, is applied in risk assessment, prevention, prognostication, and therapeutic targeting. However, several practical, ethical, and technological challenges remain. Across Europe, Personal Health Data Space (PHDS) projects are under development aiming to establish patient-centered, interoperable data ecosystems balancing data access, control, and use for individual citizens to complement the research and commercial focus of the European Health Data Space provisions. The current study explores healthcare users' and health care professionals' perspectives on personalized genomic medicine and PHDS solutions, in casu the Personal Genetic Locker (PGL). A mixed-methods design was used, including surveys, interviews, and focus groups. Several meta-themes were generated from the data: (i) participants were interested in genomic information; (ii) participants valued data control, robust infrastructure, and sharing data with non-commercial stakeholders; (iii) autonomy was a central concern for all participants; (iv) institutional and interpersonal trust were highly significant for genomic medicine; and (v) participants encouraged the implementation of PHDSs since PHDSs were thought to promote the use of genomic data and enhance patients' control over their data. To conclude, we formulated several facilitators to implement genomic medicine in healthcare based on the perspectives of a diverse set of stakeholders.

Indexed as

EcosystemGenomic MedicineDelivery of Health CareGenomicsHealth PersonnelHumansBelgiumethicsgenetic datagenomic medicinemixed-methodspersonal health data spacepersonalized medicineThe Netherlands

Identifiers

PMID37107544
PMCPMC10137790

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.