Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37112679›Full record

ReviewVaccines2023

What Type of Person Should I Be? About the Appeal to Virtues in Public Health Interventions.

Pietro Refolo, Dario Sacchini, Costanza Raimondi, Giovanna Elisa Calabrò, Antonio Gioacchino Spagnolo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pietro RefoloSection of Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Department of Healthcare Surveillance and Bioethics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1055-160X
Dario SacchiniSection of Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Department of Healthcare Surveillance and Bioethics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Costanza RaimondiSection of Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Department of Healthcare Surveillance and Bioethics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Giovanna Elisa CalabròSection of Hygiene, Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0259-3797
Antonio Gioacchino SpagnoloSection of Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Department of Healthcare Surveillance and Bioethics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5762-2164

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In line with how ethics has developed for the last three centuries, public health ethics has been widely dominated by a deontological as well as a utilitarian approach. The latter is a version of consequentialism, which states that maximizing utility is the primary goal of the majority of individuals or group action, while, on the other hand, virtue ethics, or at least the appeal to virtues, has been largely marginalized. The aim of this article is twofold. Firstly, we aim to highlight the political and ethical nature of public health interventions, often interpreted and presented as mere scientific enterprises. Secondly, we try to highlight the need to integrate or at least recognize the value of appeal to virtues in public health measures. The analysis will reference the Italian COVID-19 vaccination program as a case study. Initially, we will explore the political and ethical nature of any public health measure, using the implementation of the COVID-19 vaccination program in Italy as an example. Subsequently, we will illustrate the deontological approach to ethics, the utilitarian one, and the virtues one, focusing on the dynamic of the agent's perspective. Lastly, we will briefly analyze both the Italian COVID-19 vaccination program and the communication campaign that promoted it.

Indexed as

consequentialismdeontologismpublic healthpublic health ethicsutilitarianismvaccinationvirtues ethics

Identifiers

PMID37112679
PMCPMC10146751

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.