Evidence mapPaperPMID 37113239Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2023

Insight into phytase-producing microorganisms for phytate solubilization and soil sustainability.

Sheikh Rizwanuddin, Vijay Kumar, Pallavi Singh, Bindu Naik, Sadhna Mishra, Mansi Chauhan, Per Erik Joakim Saris, Ankit Verma, Vivek Kumar

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
28.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Production of Phytase byIndian journal of microbiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Phosphate-solubilizingFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  13. OftenFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  14. Microorganisms · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sheikh RizwanuddinDepartment Food Science and Technology, Graphic Era (Deemed to be University), Dehradun, India.
Vijay KumarHimalayan School of Biosciences, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Dehradun, India.
Pallavi SinghDepartment of Biotechnology, Graphic Era (Deemed to be University), Dehradun, India.
Bindu NaikDepartment Food Science and Technology, Graphic Era (Deemed to be University), Dehradun, India.
Sadhna MishraFaculty of Agricultural Sciences, GLA University, Mathura, India.
Mansi ChauhanDepartment of Microbiology, Graphic Era (Deemed to be University), Dehradun, India.
Per Erik Joakim SarisDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Ankit VermaHimalayan School of Biosciences, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Dehradun, India.
Vivek KumarHimalayan School of Biosciences, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Dehradun, India.
Graphic Era University · INSwami Rama Himalayan University · INGLA University · INUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing demand for food has increased dependence on chemical fertilizers that promote rapid growth and yield as well as produce toxicity and negatively affect nutritional value. Therefore, researchers are focusing on alternatives that are safe for consumption, non-toxic, cost-effective production process, and high yielding, and that require readily available substrates for mass production. The potential industrial applications of microbial enzymes have grown significantly and are still rising in the 21st century to fulfill the needs of a population that is expanding quickly and to deal with the depletion of natural resources. Due to the high demand for such enzymes, phytases have undergone extensive research to lower the amount of phytate in human food and animal feed. They constitute efficient enzymatic groups that can solubilize phytate and thus provide plants with an enriched environment. Phytases can be extracted from a variety of sources such as plants, animals, and microorganisms. Compared to plant and animal-based phytases, microbial phytases have been identified as competent, stable, and promising bioinoculants. Many reports suggest that microbial phytase can undergo mass production procedures with the use of readily available substrates. Phytases neither involve the use of any toxic chemicals during the extraction nor release any such chemicals; thus, they qualify as bioinoculants and support soil sustainability. In addition, phytase genes are now inserted into new plants/crops to enhance transgenic plants reducing the need for supplemental inorganic phosphates and phosphate accumulation in the environment. The current review covers the significance of phytase in the agriculture system, emphasizing its source, action mechanism, and vast applications.

Indexed as

agriculturebioinoculantsgrowth inducermicrobial phytasenutrient cyclephosphorussoil sustainabilitytransgenic

Identifiers

PMID37113239
PMCPMC10128089
OpenAlexW4364380691

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.