ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2023
Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structure-Activity Relationship of Flavonol O-Methylation Revealed by In Vitro, In Silico and Zebrafish Neurodegeneration Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- A cardiovascular, craniofacial, and neurodevelopmental disorder caused by loss-of-function variants in the eIF3 complex component genes EIF3A and EIF3B.American journal of human genetics · 2025Article
- FEHAT: efficient, large scale and automated heartbeat detection in Medaka fish embryos.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- scRNA-seq reveals the diversity of the developing cardiac cell lineage and molecular players in heart rhythm regulation.iScience · 2024Article
- Suprastin (Chloropyramine) Causes Proarrhythmic Deterioration of Excitation Conduction, Depolarization and Potentiates Adrenergic Automaticity in the Pulmonary Veins Myocardium.Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine · 2024Article
- A novel DSP zebrafish model reveals training- and drug-induced modulation of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy phenotypes.Cell death discovery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death. Of CVDs, congenital heart diseases are the most common congenital defects, with a prevalence of 1 in 100 live births. Despite the widespread knowledge that prenatal and postnatal drug exposure can lead to congenital abnormalities, the developmental toxicity of many FDA-approved drugs is rarely investigated. Therefore, to improve our understanding of drug side effects, we performed a high-content drug screen of 1,280 compounds using zebrafish as a model for cardiovascular analyses. Zebrafish are a well-established model for CVDs and developmental toxicity. However, flexible open-access tools to quantify cardiac phenotypes are lacking. Here, we provide
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.