Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37113979›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2023

State spaces for agriculture: A meta-systematic design automation framework.

Bryan Runck, Adam Streed, Diane R Wang, Patrick M Ewing, Michael B Kantar, Barath Raghavan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Bryan RunckUniversity of Minnesota GEMS Informatics Center, 248 Ruttan Hall, 1994 Buford Ave, St Paul, MN 55108, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7015-1539
Adam StreedIndependent Scientist, 301 S 1100 WM302 American Fork, UT 84003, USA.
Diane R WangDepartment of Agronomy, Purdue University, 915 Mitch Daniels Blvd West, Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2290-3257
Patrick M EwingUSDA-ARS-PA North Central Agricultural Research Laboratory, 2923 Medary Avenue, Brookings, SD 69803, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8515-1884
Michael B KantarDepartment of Tropical Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 3190 Maile Way, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5542-0975
Barath RaghavanDepartment for Computer Science, University of Southern California, Salvatori Computer Science Center, 941 Bloom Walk, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3862-2983
American Fork Hospital · USNorth Central College · USPurdue University West Lafayette · USUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agriculture is a designed system with the largest areal footprint of any human activity. In some cases, the designs within agriculture emerged over thousands of years, such as the use of rows for the spatial organization of crops. In other cases, designs were deliberately chosen and implemented over decades, as during the Green Revolution. Currently, much work in the agricultural sciences focuses on evaluating designs that could improve agriculture's sustainability. However, approaches to agricultural system design are diverse and fragmented, relying on individual intuition and discipline-specific methods to meet stakeholders' often semi-incompatible goals. This ad-hoc approach presents the risk that agricultural science will overlook nonobvious designs with large societal benefits. Here, we introduce a state space framework, a common approach from computer science, to address the problem of proposing and evaluating agricultural designs computationally. This approach overcomes limitations of current agricultural system design methods by enabling a general set of computational abstractions to explore and select from a very large agricultural design space, which can then be empirically tested.

Identifiers

PMID37113979
PMCPMC10129062
OpenAlexW4327615236

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.