Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37115790›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

National-level key stakeholders' perspectives regarding intervention progression and emerging challenges within the national stillbirth reduction response in Uganda.

Eric Ssegujja, Michelle Andipatin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eric SsegujjaDepartment of Health Policy Planning and Management, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-7732-1019
Michelle AndipatinDepartment of Psychology, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionImplementation of evidence-based interventions was adopted to respond to the stillbirth burden from the global campaigns. However, new challenges emerge in the process of rolling out such interventions into routine services more so in the context of resource-limited settings. Since the scale-up of policy recommendations to address stillbirth in Uganda, the health system response has seldom been explored. This study was conducted among national-level key stakeholders to elicit their perspectives regarding intervention progression and challenges emerging from the implementation of the national stillbirth reduction strategies in Uganda.

methodsThe study adopted an exploratory qualitative design with interviews conducted among a purposively selected sample of national-level actors drawn from the maternal and Child Health (MCH) policy networks. Respondents were primed with ongoing national-level stillbirth reduction strategies as a case and later asked for their opinions regarding intervention progression and emerging challenges. All interviews were conducted in English and transcribed verbatim. Atlas. ti was used to facilitate the coding processes which used a pre-determined codebook developed a priori based on the applied framework. A thematic analysis technique was used.

resultsHuman resources as reflected in the slow recruitment of essential staff, motivation and attitudes of the available human resource, on and off-drug stockouts, and equipment interruptions posed challenges to the effective implementation of interventions to address the stillbirth burden. The policy translation process was sometimes faced with deviations from the recommended practice. Deviations from guideline implementation, inadequate managerial skills of the health workers and managers in stewarding the implementation processes, inadequate implementation feedback, loops in communication and working with a passive community also posed process-dependent bottlenecks. Outcome expectation challenges stemmed from the inability to deliver stillbirth reduction interventions along the Reproductive Maternal New born Child and Adolescent Health (RMNCAH) continuum of care and the overconcentration of facility-level intervention with less focus on community/demand side interventions.

conclusionIn this exploratory study, national-level stakeholders perceive the adopted stillbirth reduction strategies as having the potential to address the burden. They, however, highlight potential challenges along the input-process-outcome continuum which ought to be addressed and opportunities to explore potential solutions befitting the national-level context.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelStillbirthAdolescentChildFemaleHealth PolicyHumansMotivationPregnancyUganda

Identifiers

PMID37115790
PMCPMC10146451

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.