ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2023
Integrating cytology into routine digital pathology workflow: a 5-year journey.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unintended consequences of legacy oversight in digital medicine.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Redefining Cytotechnologist Practice in Sweden: National Survey on Workload, Expanded Roles, and Future Competency Needs.Acta cytologica · 2026Article
- The Augmented Cytopathologist: A Conceptual Exploratory Narrative Review on Immersive and Vision-Language Models Tools in Digital Pathology.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Integrative approach for enhanced ovarian cancer diagnosis: cytology and biomarkers.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Advancements in Digital Cytopathology Since COVID-19: Insights from a Narrative Review of Review Articles.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite recent advances in digital imaging, the adoption of digital cytology is challenging due to technical limitations. This study describes our 5-year institutional experience with the implementation of digital cytology. The routine cytology workflow included conventional two-step screening by cytotechnologists, followed by sign out by pathologists. We introduced sign out of cytologic cases using a microscopic digital imaging platform operated by cytotechnologists, which allowed for remote review of slides by cytopathologists via video streaming. We also provided cytologic correlation to support the virtual slide-based sign out of histopathological specimens and for a weekly pathology-radiology conference. In addition, positive cytology cases were archived for integration into the laboratory information system and for prospective computational pathology studies. We also summarized lessons learned over the years and outlined our vision for future developments. This unique experience may serve as a role model for other institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37119336What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.