ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2023
Formation of the Heart: Defining Cardiomyocyte Progenitors at Single-Cell Resolution.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- PRDM16, a new kid on the block in cardiovascular health and disease.Cardiovascular research · 2025Review
- The Opportunities and Challenges in the Molecular Mechanism Research of Congenital Heart Disease: A Review.Molecular syndromology · 2025Review
- Integrated multi-omics analysis identifies features that predict human pluripotent stem cell-derived progenitor differentiation to cardiomyocytes.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2024Article
- Early heart development: examining the dynamics of function-form emergence.Biochemical Society transactions · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewFormation of the heart requires the coordinated addition of multiple progenitor sources which have undergone different pathways of specification and differentiation. In this review, I aim to put into context how recent studies defining cardiac progenitor heterogeneity build on our understanding of early heart development and also discuss the questions raised by this new insight. RECENT
findingsWith the development of sequencing technologies and imaging approaches, it has been possible to define, at high temporal resolution, the molecular profile and anatomical location of cardiac progenitors at the single-cell level, during the formation of the mammalian heart. Given the recent progress in our understanding of early heart development and technical advances in high-resolution time-lapse imaging and lineage analysis, we are now in a position of great potential, allowing us to resolve heart formation at previously impossible levels of detail. Understanding how this essential organ forms not only addresses questions of fundamental biological significance but also provides a blueprint for strategies to both treat and model heart disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.