Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37120610›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Reward maximization assessed using a sequential patch depletion task in a large sample of heterogeneous stock rats.

Amy M Gancarz, Suzanne H Mitchell, Anthony M George, Connor D Martin, Marisa C Turk, Heather M Bool, Fahmida Aktar, Francis Kwarteng, Abraham A Palmer, Paul J Meyer and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genomic Loci Influencing Cue-Reactivity in Heterogeneous Stock Rats.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Amy M GancarzDepartment of Psychology, California State University, Bakersfield, Bakersfield, CA, 93311, USA. agancarz@csub.edu.
Suzanne H MitchellDepartment of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Anthony M GeorgeClinical and Research Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA.
Connor D MartinClinical and Research Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA.
Marisa C TurkClinical and Research Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA.
Heather M BoolClinical and Research Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA.
Fahmida AktarClinical and Research Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA.
Francis KwartengClinical and Research Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA.
Abraham A PalmerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
Paul J MeyerDepartment of Psychology, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14260, USA.
Jerry B RichardsDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA.
David M DietzClinical and Research Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA.
Keita IshiwariClinical and Research Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA. keitaish@buffalo.edu.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USCalifornia State University, Bakersfield · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

Sequencing CoreP50DA037844 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MEYER, PAUL J · 2014 to 2023
$27.4M
Identification of genetic features of delay discounting using a heterogeneous stock rat modelU01DA046077 · NIDA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI MITCHELL, SUZANNE H · 2018 to 2022
$2.5M
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA037844NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA046077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Choice behavior requires animals to evaluate both short- and long-term advantages and disadvantages of all potential alternatives. Impulsive choice is traditionally measured in laboratory tasks by utilizing delay discounting (DD), a paradigm that offers a choice between a smaller immediate reward, or a larger more delayed reward. This study tested a large sample of Heterogeneous Stock (HS) male (n = 896) and female (n = 898) rats, part of a larger genetic study, to investigate whether measures of reward maximization overlapped with traditional models of delay discounting via the patch depletion model using a Sequential Patch Depletion procedure. In this task, rats were offered a concurrent choice between two water "patches" and could elect to "stay" in the current patch or "leave" for an alternative patch. Staying in the current patch resulted in decreasing subsequent reward magnitudes, whereas the choice to leave a patch was followed by a delay and a resetting to the maximum reward magnitude. Based on the delay in a given session, different visit durations were necessary to obtain the maximum number of rewards. Visit duration may be analogous to an indifference point in traditional DD tasks. Males and females did not significantly differ on traditional measures of DD (e.g. delay gradient; AUC). When examining measures of patch utilization, females made fewer patch changes at all delays and spent more time in the patch before leaving for the alternative patch compared to males. Consistent with this, there was some evidence that females deviated from reward maximization more than males. However, when controlling for body weight, females had a higher normalized rate of reinforcement than males. Measures of reward maximization were only weakly associated with traditional DD measures and may represent distinctive underlying processes. Taken together, females performance differed from males with regard to reward maximization that were not observed utilizing traditional measures of DD, suggesting that the patch depletion model was more sensitive to modest sex differences when compared to traditional DD measures in a large sample of HS rats.

Indexed as

Delay DiscountingAnimalsChoice BehaviorFemaleImpulsive BehaviorMaleRatsReinforcement, PsychologyRewardSex Characteristics

Identifiers

PMID37120610
PMCPMC10148848
OpenAlexW4367368258

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.