ArticleBMC bioinformatics2023
Prediction of disease-related miRNAs by voting with multiple classifiers.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Uncovering miRNA-Disease Associations Through Graph Based Neural Network Representations.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- From biogenesis to deep modeling: a holistic review of miRNA-disease prediction computational methods with experimental comparison.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- The Importance of Genetic Screening on the Syndromes of Colorectal Cancer and Gastric Cancer: A 2024 Update.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Article
- GeneAI 3.0: powerful, novel, generalized hybrid and ensemble deep learning frameworks for miRNA species classification of stationary patterns from nucleotides.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Prediction of miRNAs and diseases association based on sparse autoencoder and MLP.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
There is strong evidence to support that mutations and dysregulation of miRNAs are associated with a variety of diseases, including cancer. However, the experimental methods used to identify disease-related miRNAs are expensive and time-consuming. Effective computational approaches to identify disease-related miRNAs are in high demand and would aid in the detection of lncRNA biomarkers for disease diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. In this study, we develop an ensemble learning framework to reveal the potential associations between miRNAs and diseases (ELMDA). The ELMDA framework does not rely on the known associations when calculating miRNA and disease similarities and uses multi-classifiers voting to predict disease-related miRNAs. As a result, the average AUC of the ELMDA framework was 0.9229 for the HMDD v2.0 database in a fivefold cross-validation. All potential associations in the HMDD V2.0 database were predicted, and 90% of the top 50 results were verified with the updated HMDD V3.2 database. The ELMDA framework was implemented to investigate gastric neoplasms, prostate neoplasms and colon neoplasms, and 100%, 94%, and 90%, respectively, of the top 50 potential miRNAs were validated by the HMDD V3.2 database. Moreover, the ELMDA framework can predict isolated disease-related miRNAs. In conclusion, ELMDA appears to be a reliable method to uncover disease-associated miRNAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.