Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37122213›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2023

Feedback contributions to excitation-contraction coupling in native functioning striated muscle.

Samantha C Salvage, Angela F Dulhunty, Kamalan Jeevaratnam, Antony P Jackson, Christopher L-H Huang

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Aberrant evoked calcium signaling and nAChR cluster morphology in aFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Cardiomyocyte electrophysiology and its modulation: current views and future prospects.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Samantha C SalvageDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QW, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5793-2349
Angela F DulhuntyEccles Institute of Neuroscience, John Curtin School of Medical Research, The Australian National University, 131 Garran Road, Acton 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9493-4944
Kamalan JeevaratnamFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Daphne Jackson Road, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK.
Antony P JacksonDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QW, UK.
Christopher L-H HuangDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QW, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9553-6112
University of Cambridge · GBAustralian National University · AUUniversity of Surrey · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/14/79/31102British Heart Foundation PG/19/59/34582Medical Research Council MR/M001288/1Wellcome Trust 105727/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skeletal and cardiac muscle excitation-contraction coupling commences with Na

Indexed as

DantroleneRyanodine Receptor Calcium Release ChannelAction PotentialsAnimalsCalciumFeedbackMiceMuscle, SkeletalCalciumDantroleneRyanodine Receptor Calcium Release ChannelCa2+ regulationC-terminal domainsIII-IV linkerNa+ channelryanodine receptorT-SR junction

Identifiers

PMID37122213
PMCPMC10150225
OpenAlexW4367601114

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.