Evidence mapPaperPMID 37122545Full record

ReviewRSC medicinal chemistry2023

Peptide-based positron emission tomography probes: current strategies for synthesis and radiolabelling.

Mariacristina Failla, Giuseppe Floresta, Vincenzo Abbate

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC medicinal chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Advances in GPCR-Targeted PET Radiotracer Patents (2020-2025).Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evaluation of [Molecular imaging and biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The [18F] F-PSMA Probe: Chemical Perspectives.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Computer-Assisted Design of Peptide-Based Radiotracers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mariacristina FaillaDepartment of Drug Science and Technology, University of Turin Via P. Giuria 9 10125 Turin Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2318-2332
Giuseppe FlorestaKing's College London, Institute of Pharmaceutical Science Franklin Wilkins Building London SE1 9NH UK giuseppe.floresta@unict.it vincenzo.abbate@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0668-1260
Vincenzo AbbateKing's College London, Institute of Pharmaceutical Science Franklin Wilkins Building London SE1 9NH UK giuseppe.floresta@unict.it vincenzo.abbate@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3300-0520
King's College London · GBUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In medical imaging, techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging, contrast-enhanced computerized tomography, and positron emission tomography (PET) are extensively available and routinely used for disease diagnosis and treatment. Peptide-based targeting PET probes are usually small peptides with high affinity and specificity to specific cellular and tissue targets opportunely engineered for acting as PET probes. For instance, either the radioisotope (

Identifiers

PMID37122545
PMCPMC10131587
OpenAlexW4313648975

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.