Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37124253›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2023

Changes in sleep quality and sleep disturbances in the general population from before to during the COVID-19 lockdown: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Federica Limongi, Paola Siviero, Caterina Trevisan, Marianna Noale, Filippo Catalani, Chiara Ceolin, Silvia Conti, Elisa di Rosa, Elena Perdixi, Francesca Remelli and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Federica Limongi *Aging Branch, Neuroscience Institute, National Research Council, Padova, Italy.
Paola Siviero *Aging Branch, Neuroscience Institute, National Research Council, Padova, Italy.
Caterina TrevisanAging Branch, Neuroscience Institute, National Research Council, Padova, Italy.
Marianna NoaleAging Branch, Neuroscience Institute, National Research Council, Padova, Italy.
Filippo CatalaniGeriatric Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Chiara CeolinGeriatric Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Silvia ContiUnit of Behavioral Neurology and Dementia Research Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Elisa di RosaDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Elena PerdixiUnit of Behavioral Neurology and Dementia Research Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Francesca RemelliDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Federica PrinelliEpidemiology Unit, Institute of Biomedical Technologies, National Research Council, Milano, Italy.
Stefania MaggiAging Branch, Neuroscience Institute, National Research Council, Padova, Italy.
National Research Council · ITUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Ferrara · ITNeuroscience Institute · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to explore changes in sleep quality and sleep disturbances in the general population from before to during the COVID-19 lockdown. Methods: The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021256378) and the PRISMA guidelines were followed. The major databases and gray literature were systematically searched from inception to 28/05/2021 to identify observational studies evaluating sleep changes in the general population during the lockdown with respect to the pre-lockdown period. A random effects meta-analysis was undertaken for studies reporting (a) the means of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) global scores or the means of the sleep onset latency (SOL) times (minutes - min) before and during the lockdown, (b) the percentages of poor sleep quality before and during the lockdown, or (c) the percentages of changes in sleep quality. Subgroup analysis by risk of bias and measurement tool utilized was carried out. A narrative synthesis on sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, insomnia and sleep medication consumption was also performed. Results: Sixty-three studies were included. A decline in sleep quality, reflected in a pooled increase in the PSQI global scores (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.26; 95% CI 0.17-0.34) and in SOL (SMD = 0.38 min; 95% CI 0.30-0.45) were found. The percentage of individuals with poor sleep quality increased during the lockdown (pooled relative risk 1.4; 95% CI 1.24-1.61). Moreover, 57.3% (95% CI 50.01-61.55) of the individuals reported a change in sleep quality; in 37.3% (95% CI 34.27-40.39) of these, it was a worsening. The studies included in the systematic review reported a decrease in sleep efficiency and an increase in sleep disturbances, insomnia, and in sleep medication consumption. Discussion: Timely interventions are warranted in view of the decline in sleep quality and the increase in sleep disturbances uncovered and their potentially negative impact on health. Further research and in particular longitudinal studies using validated instruments examining the long-term impact of the lockdown on sleep variables is needed. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021256378, identifier CRD42021256378.

Indexed as

changesCOVID-19 lockdowngeneral populationinsomniasleep disturbancessleep efficiencysleep onset latencysleep quality

Identifiers

PMID37124253
PMCPMC10134452
OpenAlexW4365451812

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.