ReviewHeliyon2023
A critical appraisal of neurological evidence on paediatric COVID-19 patients. A systematic literature review.
Review in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neuroimaging findings in children with COVID-19 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of our study was to assess the close direct relationship between the development of neurological manifestations and SARS-CoV-2 infection in paediatric patients, by a systematic review of the literature. Methods: PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for publications from the start of the pandemic up to 31 December 2022. We included articles that described nervous system manifestations in patients aged 0-18 years with RT-PCR nasopharyngeal swab positivity for SARS-CoV-2. Results: The initial search produced 3456 records, of which 37, involving a total of 48 paediatric patients, were included in our systematic review. The neurological complications were heterogeneous, due at least in part to the different age groups considered. In the literature, encephalitis was the most common diagnosis (20.83%). Clinical presentation, diagnostic support, treatment and outcome were analysed both in the literature and in our experience. Conclusions: Neurological impairment can occur with the first clinical presentation of COVID-19, even in previously healthy children and with mild forms of the disease. The clinical presentations are heterogeneous in the different age groups. In most patients the outcome is good and neurological manifestations subside after discharge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.