ArticleCJC open2023
Clinical Predictors of Pacing Device Implantation in Implantable Cardiac Monitor Recipients for Unexplained Syncope.
Article in CJC open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictors of pacemaker requirement in patients with implantable loop recorder and unexplained syncope: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical cardiology · 2024Pooled it
- An Implantable Loop Recorder in the Diagnosis of Cardiac Arrhythmias: The Importance of Drug Treatment in Predicting Pacemaker Requirement.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Detection rate by time period and predictors of serious arrhythmias in unexplained syncope: a multicenter implantable loop recorder registry study.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Implantable cardiac monitors (ICMs) help investigate the cause of unexplained syncope, but the probability and predictors of needing a pacing device thereafter remain unclear. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who received ICM insertion for unexplained syncope with suspected arrhythmic etiology. The data were obtained from a nationwide database obtained between April 1, 2012 and March 31, 2020. Multivariable mixed-effects survival analysis was performed to identify predictors of pacing device implantation (PDI), and a risk score model was developed accordingly. Results: In total, 2905 patients (age: 72 years [range: 60-78]) implanted with ICMs to investigate the cause of syncope were analyzed. During the median follow-up period of 128 days (range: 68-209) days, 473 patients (16%) underwent PDI. Older age, history of atrial fibrillation, bundle branch block (BBB), and diabetes were independent predictors of PDI in multivariable analysis. A risk score model was developed with scores ranging from 0 to 32 points. When patients with the lowest quartile score (0-13 points) were used as a reference, those with higher quartiles had a higher risk of PDI (second quartile: 14-15 points, hazard ratio [HR]: 3.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.62-5.68; third quartile: 16-18 points, HR: 4.67, 95% CI: 3.14-6.94; fourth quartile: 19-32 points, HR: 6.59, 95% CI: 4.47-9.71). Conclusions: The 4 identified predictors are easily assessed during the initial evaluation of patients with syncope. They may help identify patients with a higher risk of requiring permanent PDI.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.