Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37126148›Full record

SynthesisOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2023

Protein intake and bone health: an umbrella review of systematic reviews for the evidence-based guideline of the German Nutrition Society.

Armin Zittermann, Annemarie Schmidt, Julia Haardt, Nicole Kalotai, Andreas Lehmann, Sarah Egert, Sabine Ellinger, Anja Kroke, Stefan Lorkowski, Sandrine Louis and 8 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effects of combined protein and exercise interventions on bone health in middle-aged and older adults - A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Armin ZittermannClinic for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Herz-und Diabeteszentrum Nordrhein Westfalen, Ruhr University Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany. corresponding_author@dge.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6085-6554
Annemarie SchmidtScience Department, German Nutrition Society, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4607-4534
Julia HaardtScience Department, German Nutrition Society, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7394-4481
Nicole KalotaiScience Department, German Nutrition Society, Bonn, Germany.
Andreas LehmannScience Department, German Nutrition Society, Bonn, Germany.
Sarah EgertDepartment of Nutrition and Food Science, Nutritional Physiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Sabine EllingerDepartment of Nutrition and Food Science, Human Nutrition, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9988-9406
Anja KrokeDepartment of Nutritional, Food and Consumer Sciences, Fulda University of Applied Sciences, Fulda, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0253-1644
Stefan LorkowskiInstitute of Nutritionals Sciences, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9649-840X
Sandrine LouisDepartment of Physiology and Biochemistry of Nutrition, Max Rubner-Institut, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Matthias B SchulzeDepartment of Molecular Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Nuthetal, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0830-5277
Lukas SchwingshacklInstitute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3407-7594
Roswitha SienerDepartment of Urology, University Stone Center, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5068-6950
Gabriele I StanglInstitute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Halle, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8073-524X
Dorothee VolkertInstitute for Biomedicine of Aging, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nuremberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1003-6395
Bernhard WatzlDepartment of Physiology and Biochemistry of Nutrition, Max Rubner-Institut, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Heike A Bischoff-FerrariDepartment of Aging Medicine and Aging Research, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, and City Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
German Nutrition Society

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This umbrella review aimed at assessing whether a protein intake exceeding the current recommendation for younger (0.8 g/kg body weight [BW]/day) and older (1.0 g/kg BW/day) adults affects bone mineral density and fracture risk. Moreover, the effect of animal or plant protein was evaluated. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for systematic reviews (SRs) with or without meta-analysis of prospective studies published between 11/2008 and 08/2021. Methodological quality, outcome-specific certainty of evidence, and overall certainty of evidence of the retrieved SRs were assessed using established tools and predefined criteria. Eleven SRs of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and/or cohort studies were included. In SRs of cohort studies and RCTs, protein intake/kg BW/day ranged between 0.21-0.95 g (low intake) and > 1.24 g (high intake), respectively, and between 0.67-1.1 g (control groups) and 1.01-1.69 g (intervention groups), respectively. The vast majority of outcome-specific certainty of evidence was rated "low" or "very low." The overall certainty of evidence for an association (cohort studies) or effect (RCTs) of total, animal or plant protein intake on each of the investigated outcomes was rated "insufficient," with the exception of possible evidence for a reduced hip fracture risk by high vs. low protein intake. Since protein intakes in low/control and high/intervention groups were very heterogeneous and with low certainty of evidence, it remains unclear whether a dose above the current recommendation or type of protein intake (animal or plant protein) affects bone health overall. However, there is possible evidence for reduced hip fracture risk with high versus low protein intake.

Indexed as

Bone DensityFractures, BoneBone and BonesHumansNutritional StatusSystematic Reviews as TopicBone healthBone mineral densityEvidence-based guidelineFracture riskProteinUmbrella review

Identifiers

PMID37126148
PMCPMC10382330

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.